Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Suchtaktik"
  1. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.01 
    0.010692978 = product of:
  0.021385957 = sum of:
    0.021385957 = product of:
      0.085543826 = sum of:
        0.085543826 = weight(_text_:authors in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.085543826 = score(doc=4915,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
  2. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Lam, H.M.; Burton, R.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 5: user-intermediary interaction (2002) 0.01 
    0.009073292 = product of:
  0.018146584 = sum of:
    0.018146584 = product of:
      0.072586335 = sum of:
        0.072586335 = weight(_text_:authors in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.072586335 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.24018547 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ellis, et alia, now provide part five of their study on mediated searching which is treated separately here because of the presence of additional authors. The data source remains cases collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K. but the focus here is on seeker/intermediary interaction utilizing the Saracevic triadic IR model, and the method is the analysis of discourse. While the pre-search interview stressed problem definition, interaction during the search in terms of relevance and magnitude continued to develop the problem statement. The user and intermediary focused on search tactics, review and relevance, while the intermediary interaction with the system was comprised of terminology and answers. The interaction clearly affected the search process. Users and intermediaries considered the process effective and users felt the intermediary increased their overall satisfaction.
  3. Spink, A.; Park, M.; Koshman, S.: Factors affecting assigned information problem ordering during Web search : an exploratory study (2006) 0.01 
    0.0054069017 = product of:
  0.010813803 = sum of:
    0.010813803 = product of:
      0.021627607 = sum of:
        0.021627607 = weight(_text_:m in 991) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021627607 = score(doc=991,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13110629 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.052685954 = queryNorm
            0.1649624 = fieldWeight in 991, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.4884486 = idf(docFreq=9980, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=991)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Authors

Themes