Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Wolfram, D.; Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Vox populi : the public searching of the Web (2001) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 6949) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=6949,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 6949, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=6949)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  2. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users and real needs : a study and analysis of users queries on the Web (2000) 0.03 
    0.026756732 = product of:
  0.053513464 = sum of:
    0.053513464 = product of:
      0.10702693 = sum of:
        0.10702693 = weight(_text_:t in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10702693 = score(doc=411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.5222967 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  3. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01 
    0.010571363 = product of:
  0.021142727 = sum of:
    0.021142727 = product of:
      0.042285454 = sum of:
        0.042285454 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.042285454 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  4. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: Human information behavior : integrating diverse approaches and information use (2006) 0.01 
    0.010557194 = product of:
  0.021114388 = sum of:
    0.021114388 = product of:
      0.084457554 = sum of:
        0.084457554 = weight(_text_:authors in 4915) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.084457554 = score(doc=4915,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.35615736 = fieldWeight in 4915, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4915)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    For millennia humans have sought, organized, and used information as they learned and evolved patterns of human information behaviors to resolve their human problems and survive. However, despite the current focus an living in an "information age," we have a limited evolutionary understanding of human information behavior. In this article the authors examine the current three interdisciplinary approaches to conceptualizing how humans have sought information including (a) the everyday life information seeking-sense-making approach, (b) the information foraging approach, and (c) the problem-solution perspective an information seeking approach. In addition, due to the lack of clarity regarding the rote of information use in information behavior, a fourth information approach is provided based an a theory of information use. The use theory proposed starts from an evolutionary psychology notion that humans are able to adapt to their environment and survive because of our modular cognitive architecture. Finally, the authors begin the process of conceptualizing these diverse approaches, and the various aspects or elements of these approaches, within an integrated model with consideration of information use. An initial integrated model of these different approaches with information use is proposed.
  5. He, S.; Spink, A.: ¬A comparison of foreign authorship distribution in JASIST and the Journal of Documentation (2002) 0.01 
    0.010451089 = product of:
  0.020902177 = sum of:
    0.020902177 = product of:
      0.08360871 = sum of:
        0.08360871 = weight(_text_:authors in 5230) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.08360871 = score(doc=5230,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 5230, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5230)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    He and Spink count the first authors in JASIST and JDoc from 1950 to 1999 whose affiliation is outside the country of origin of each publication and record the time period and the author's geographic location. Foreign authorship in JASIST increased nearly four fold from 1995 to 1999 and the number of represented locations 3.6 times while in the same time period JDoc's foreign authorship doubled and foreign locations increased four fold. The largest foreign location for JDoc is the USA and the largest foreign location for JASIST is the UK. Canada is second on both lists.
  6. Ellis, D.; Wilson, T.D.; Ford, N.; Foster, A.; Lam, H.M.; Burton, R.; Spink, A.: Information seeking and mediated searching : Part 5: user-intermediary interaction (2002) 0.01 
    0.008958076 = product of:
  0.017916152 = sum of:
    0.017916152 = product of:
      0.07166461 = sum of:
        0.07166461 = weight(_text_:authors in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.07166461 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.2371355 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.30220953 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Ellis, et alia, now provide part five of their study on mediated searching which is treated separately here because of the presence of additional authors. The data source remains cases collected from 198 individuals, 87 in Texas and 111 in Sheffield in the U.K. but the focus here is on seeker/intermediary interaction utilizing the Saracevic triadic IR model, and the method is the analysis of discourse. While the pre-search interview stressed problem definition, interaction during the search in terms of relevance and magnitude continued to develop the problem statement. The user and intermediary focused on search tactics, review and relevance, while the intermediary interaction with the system was comprised of terminology and answers. The interaction clearly affected the search process. Users and intermediaries considered the process effective and users felt the intermediary increased their overall satisfaction.
  7. Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001) 0.01 
    0.00891891 = product of:
  0.01783782 = sum of:
    0.01783782 = product of:
      0.03567564 = sum of:
        0.03567564 = weight(_text_:t in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03567564 = score(doc=6980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20491594 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.17409891 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.9394085 = idf(docFreq=2338, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
  8. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: ¬A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval (2005) 0.01 
    0.0070475754 = product of:
  0.014095151 = sum of:
    0.014095151 = product of:
      0.028190302 = sum of:
        0.028190302 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028190302 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18215442 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05201693 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    19. 1.2007 12:55:22

Authors

Themes