Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Spink, A."
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.; Saracevic, T.: Real life, real users and real needs : a study and analysis of users queries on the Web (2000) 0.06
    0.05823561 = product of:
      0.29117805 = sum of:
        0.29117805 = weight(_text_:2000 in 411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.29117805 = score(doc=411,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.34275603 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.84951985 = fieldWeight in 411, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=411)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Information processing and management. 36(2000) no.2, S.207-227
    Year
    2000
  2. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: ¬A multitasking framework for cognitive information retrieval (2005) 0.03
    0.034743812 = product of:
      0.086859524 = sum of:
        0.041021824 = weight(_text_:7 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.041021824 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28019404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.14640506 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
        0.045837704 = weight(_text_:22 in 642) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.045837704 = score(doc=642,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29618484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.15476047 = fieldWeight in 642, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=642)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    Information retrieval (IR) research has developed considerably since the 1950's to include consideration of more cognitive, interactive and iterative processes during the interaction between humans and IR or Web systems (Ingwersen, 1992, 1996). Interactive search sessions by humans with IR systems have been depicted as interactive IR models (Saracevic, 1997). Human-IR system interaction is also modeled as taking place within the context of broader human information behavior (HIB) processes (Spink et al., 2002). Research into the human or cognitive (user modeling) aspects of IR is a growing body of research on user interactivity, task performance and measures for observing user interactivity. The task context and situational characteristics of users' searches and evaluation have also been identified as key elements in a user's interaction with an IR system (Cool and Spink, 2002; Vakkari, 2003). Major theorized interactive IR models have been proposed relating to the single search episode, including Ingwersen's (1992,1996) Cognitive Model of IR Interaction, Belkin et al.'s (1995) Episodic Interaction Model, and Saracevic's (1996,1997) Stratified Model of IR Interaction. In this chapter we examine Saracevic's Stratified Model of IR Interaction and extend the model within the framework of cognitive IR (CIR) to depict CIR as a multitasking process. This chapter provides a new direction for CIR research by conceptualizing IR with a multitasking context. The next section of the chapter defines the concept of multitasking in the cognitive sciences and Section 3 discusses the emerging understanding of multitasking information behavior. In Section 4, cognitive IR is depicted within a multitasking framework using Saracevic's (1996, 1997) Stratified Model of IR Interaction. In Section 5, we link information searching and seeking models together, via Saracevic's Stratified Model of IR Interaction, but starting with a unitask model of HIB. We begin to model multitasking in cognitive IR in Section 6. In Sections 7 and 8, we increase the complexity of our developing multitasking model of cognitive IR by adding coordinating mechanisms, including feedback loops. Finally, in Section 9, we conclude the chapter and indicate future directions for further research.
    Date
    19. 1.2007 12:55:22
  3. Spink, A.; Cole, C.: New directions in cognitive information retrieval : introduction (2005) 0.02
    0.02111937 = product of:
      0.10559685 = sum of:
        0.10559685 = weight(_text_:objects in 647) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10559685 = score(doc=647,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.44954884 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.23489517 = fieldWeight in 647, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              5.315071 = idf(docFreq=590, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=647)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Humans have used electronic information retrieval (IR) systems for more than 50 years as they evolved from experimental systems to full-scale Web search engines and digital libraries. The fields of library and information science (LIS), cognitive science, human factors and computer science have historically been the leading disciplines in conducting research that seeks to model human interaction with IR systems for all kinds of information related behaviors. As technology problems have been mastered, the theoretical and applied framework for studying human interaction with IR systems has evolved from systems-centered to more user-centered, or cognitive-centered approaches. However, cognitive information retrieval (CIR) research that focuses on user interaction with IR systems is still largely under-funded and is often not included at computing and systems design oriented conferences. But CIR-focused research continues, and there are signs that some IR systems designers in academia and the Web search business are realizing that user behavior research can provide valuable insights into systems design and evaluation. The goal of our book is to provide an overview of new CIR research directions. This book does not provide a history of the research field of CIR. Instead, the book confronts new ways of looking at the human information condition with regard to our increasing need to interact with IR systems. The need has grown due to a number of factors, including the increased importance of information to more people in this information age. Also, IR was once considered document-oriented, but has now evolved to include multimedia, text, and other information objects. As a result, IR systems and their complexity have proliferated as users and user purposes for using them have also proliferated. Human interaction with IR systems can often be frustrating as people often lack an understanding of IR system functionality.
  4. Zhang, Y.; Jansen, B.J.; Spink, A.: Identification of factors predicting clickthrough in Web searching using neural network analysis (2009) 0.01
    0.01375131 = product of:
      0.06875655 = sum of:
        0.06875655 = weight(_text_:22 in 2742) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06875655 = score(doc=2742,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.29618484 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2742, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2742)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    22. 3.2009 17:49:11
  5. Jansen, B.J.; Booth, D.L.; Spink, A.: Patterns of query reformulation during Web searching (2009) 0.01
    0.012306548 = product of:
      0.06153274 = sum of:
        0.06153274 = weight(_text_:7 in 2936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06153274 = score(doc=2936,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28019404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.21960759 = fieldWeight in 2936, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2936)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.7, S.1358-1371
  6. Spink, A.; Wolfram, D.; Jansen, B.J.; Saracevic, T.: Searching the Web : the public and their queries (2001) 0.01
    0.012277146 = product of:
      0.06138573 = sum of:
        0.06138573 = weight(_text_:2000 in 6980) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06138573 = score(doc=6980,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.34275603 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.17909452 = fieldWeight in 6980, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0524464 = idf(docFreq=2088, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=6980)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    In previous articles, we reported the state of Web searching in 1997 (Jansen, Spink, & Saracevic, 2000) and in 1999 (Spink, Wolfram, Jansen, & Saracevic, 2001). Such snapshot studies and statistics on Web use appear regularly (OCLC, 1999), but provide little information about Web searching trends. In this article, we compare and contrast results from our two previous studies of Excite queries' data sets, each containing over 1 million queries submitted by over 200,000 Excite users collected on 16 September 1997 and 20 December 1999. We examine how public Web searching changing during that 2-year time period. As Table 1 shows, the overall structure of Web queries in some areas did not change, while in others we see change from 1997 to 1999. Our comparison shows how Web searching changed incrementally and also dramatically. We see some moves toward greater simplicity, including shorter queries (i.e., fewer terms) and shorter sessions (i.e., fewer queries per user), with little modification (addition or deletion) of terms in subsequent queries. The trend toward shorter queries suggests that Web information content should target specific terms in order to reach Web users. Another trend was to view fewer pages of results per query. Most Excite users examined only one page of results per query, since an Excite results page contains ten ranked Web sites. Were users satisfied with the results and did not need to view more pages? It appears that the public continues to have a low tolerance of wading through retrieved sites. This decline in interactivity levels is a disturbing finding for the future of Web searching. Queries that included Boolean operators were in the minority, but the percentage increased between the two time periods. Most Boolean use involved the AND operator with many mistakes. The use of relevance feedback almost doubled from 1997 to 1999, but overall use was still small. An unusually large number of terms were used with low frequency, such as personal names, spelling errors, non-English words, and Web-specific terms, such as URLs. Web query vocabulary contains more words than found in large English texts in general. The public language of Web queries has its own and unique characteristics. How did Web searching topics change from 1997 to 1999? We classified a random sample of 2,414 queries from 1997 and 2,539 queries from 1999 into 11 categories (Table 2). From 1997 to 1999, Web searching shifted from entertainment, recreation and sex, and pornography, preferences to e-commerce-related topics under commerce, travel, employment, and economy. This shift coincided with changes in information distribution on the publicly indexed Web.
  7. Spink, A.; Jansen, B.J.: Web searching : public searching of the Web (2004) 0.01
    0.005127728 = product of:
      0.02563864 = sum of:
        0.02563864 = weight(_text_:7 in 1443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02563864 = score(doc=1443,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.28019404 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.08458003 = queryNorm
            0.09150316 = fieldWeight in 1443, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.3127685 = idf(docFreq=4376, maxDocs=44218)
              0.01953125 = fieldNorm(doc=1443)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Date
    7. 9.1996 17:35:55