Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Staab, S."
  1. Staab, S.; Studer, R.; Sure, Y.; Volz, R.: SEAL - a SEmantic portAL with content management functionality (2002) 0.01
    0.009338801 = product of:
      0.023347002 = sum of:
        0.009138121 = weight(_text_:a in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009138121 = score(doc=3601,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.1709182 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
        0.014208881 = product of:
          0.028417762 = sum of:
            0.028417762 = weight(_text_:information in 3601) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028417762 = score(doc=3601,freq=18.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.34911853 = fieldWeight in 3601, product of:
                  4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
                    18.0 = termFreq=18.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3601)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Abstract
    "OntoWeb" is an European Union IST-funded thematic network for "Ontology-based information exchange for knowledge management and electronic commerce". The corresponding OntoWeb portal constitutes a Web-based research information system that is driven by some of the technologies which it reports about. In this paper, we present the core methodology underlying the OntoWeb portal, viz. SEAL (SEmantic portAL). In particular, we describe some of the core challenges that SEAL must meet. Because of the distributed nature of research information, SEAL has been developed as a methodology that integrates heterogeneous information from distributed resources. Because of the complexity of the application domain, SEAL is based an ontologies about research information that greatly contribute to the combined goals of low-effort information integration and user-friendly information presentation. Because of the high quality requirements obliged onto the OntoWeb portal, SEAL has been extended with content management functionality supporting portal editors in their process to rule out undesirable content.
    Source
    Gaining insight from research information (CRIS2002): Proceedings of the 6th International Conference an Current Research Information Systems, University of Kassel, August 29 - 31, 2002. Eds: W. Adamczak u. A. Nase
    Type
    a
  2. Staab, S.: ¬Der Weg ins "Semantic Web" ist ein Schichtenmodell (2002) 0.00
    0.0023527963 = product of:
      0.0058819903 = sum of:
        0.002724461 = weight(_text_:a in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.002724461 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.050957955 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
        0.003157529 = product of:
          0.006315058 = sum of:
            0.006315058 = weight(_text_:information in 870) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.006315058 = score(doc=870,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08139861 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046368346 = queryNorm
                0.0775819 = fieldWeight in 870, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=870)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.4 = coord(2/5)
    
    Source
    Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 53(2002) H.5, S.300
    Type
    a
  3. Staab, S.: Knowledge processes and ontologies (2001) 0.00
    0.0021795689 = product of:
      0.010897844 = sum of:
        0.010897844 = weight(_text_:a in 4026) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010897844 = score(doc=4026,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 4026, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=4026)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Fensel, D.; Staab, S.; Studer, R.; Harmelen, F. van; Davies, J.: ¬A future perspective : exploiting peer-to-peer and the Semantic Web for knowledge management (2004) 0.00
    0.0019071229 = product of:
      0.009535614 = sum of:
        0.009535614 = weight(_text_:a in 2262) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009535614 = score(doc=2262,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.053464882 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046368346 = queryNorm
            0.17835285 = fieldWeight in 2262, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2262)
      0.2 = coord(1/5)
    
    Abstract
    Over the past few years, we have seen a growing interest in the potential of both peer-to-peer (P2P) computing and the use of more formal approaches to knowledge management, involving the development of ontologies. This penultimate chapter discusses possibilities that both approaches may offer for more effective and efficient knowledge management. In particular, we investigate how the two paradigms may be combined. In this chapter, we describe our vision in terms of a set of future steps that need to be taken to bring the results described in earlier chapters to their full potential.
    Type
    a