Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

0.017800095 = product of:
  0.05340028 = sum of:
    0.014110449 = weight(_text_:in in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.014110449 = score(doc=917,freq=20.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2376267 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
          4.472136 = tf(freq=20.0), with freq of:
            20.0 = termFreq=20.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
    0.039289832 = weight(_text_:und in 917) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.039289832 = score(doc=917,freq=22.0), product of:
        0.09675359 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.40608138 = fieldWeight in 917, product of:
          4.690416 = tf(freq=22.0), with freq of:
            22.0 = termFreq=22.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=917)
  0.33333334 = coord(2/6)

Abstract

Digitale Bibliotheken stehen derzeit vor der Herausforderung, den veränderten Informationsbedürfnissen ihrer wissenschaftlichen Nutzer nachzukommen und einen integrierten Zugriff auf verschiedene Informationsarten (z.B. Publikationen, Primärdaten, Wissenschaftler- und. Organisationsprofile, Forschungsprojektinformationen) zu bieten, die in zunehmenden Maße digital zur Verfügung stehen und diese in virtuellen Forschungsumgebungen verfügbar zu machen. Die daraus resultierende Herausforderungen struktureller und semantischer Heterogenität werden durch ein weites Feld von verschiedenen Metadaten-Standards, Inhaltserschließungsverfahren sowie Indexierungsansätze für verschiedene Arten von Information getragen. Bisher existiert jedoch kein allgemeingültiges, integrierendes Modell für Organisation und Retrieval von Wissen in Digitalen Bibliotheken. Dieser Beitrag stellt aktuelle Forschungsentwicklungen und -aktivitäten vor, die die Problematik der semantischen Interoperabilität in Digitalen Bibliotheken behandeln und präsentiert ein Modell für eine integrierte Suche in textuellen Daten (z.B. Publikationen) und Faktendaten (z.B. Primärdaten), das verschiedene Ansätze der aktuellen Forschung aufgreift und miteinander in Bezug setzt. Eingebettet in den Forschungszyklus treffen dabei traditionelle Inhaltserschließungsverfahren für Publikationen auf neuere ontologie-basierte Ansätze, die für die Repräsentation komplexerer Informationen und Zusammenhänge (z.B. in sozialwissenschaftlichen Umfragedaten) geeigneter scheinen. Die Vorteile des Modells sind (1) die einfache Wiederverwendbarkeit bestehender Wissensorganisationssysteme sowie (2) ein geringer Aufwand bei der Konzeptmodellierung durch Ontologien.

Series

Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.12

0.002145118 = product of:
  0.0128707085 = sum of:
    0.0128707085 = weight(_text_:in in 940) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0128707085 = score(doc=940,freq=26.0), product of:
        0.059380736 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.043654136 = queryNorm
        0.2167489 = fieldWeight in 940, product of:
          5.0990195 = tf(freq=26.0), with freq of:
            26.0 = termFreq=26.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=940)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)

Abstract

Grey Literature and Open Access publications have the potential to become the basis of new types of scientific publications, in which scientific discourse and collaboration can play a central role in the dissemination of knowledge, due to their machine-readable format and electronic availability. With advances in cyber science and e-(Social) Science, an increasing number of scientific publications are required to be shared with different group members or even within communities in virtual reading environments. However, the most often used format for publishing articles on the web is still the Adobe PDF format, which limits the extent to which readers of an article can interact with online content and within their browser environment. This not only separates the formal communication - the article itself - from the informal communication about a publication - the discussion about the article - but also fails to link the different threads of communications which might appear in parallel at different locations in the scientific community as a whole. Analysis of around 30 web sites where different ways for presenting formal and informal communications were conducted shows in the identification of several prototypes of media combinations which were then evaluated against human factor aspects (distance between related information, arrangement of related information etc). Based on this evaluation we concluded that at the time of analysis, no model exist for directly integrating formal and informal communication to a single media, allowing readers of publications to directly discuss within the publication, e.g. to extend the publication with their input directly at the paragraph they wanted to comment. Therefore, a new publishing medium is necessary to fulfil the gap between the formal and informal communication, facilitating and engaging academic readers' active participating in the online scientific discourse. We have developed an online discussion service, which allows interactive features for annotation directly available at the point in the publication to which the comment refers to. Besides the exchange of ideas and the stimulation of discourse across portals and communities we approach at the same time to create a new basis for research in scientific discourse, networking and collaboration. This is supported by linking from the individual article to other publications or information items in digital libraries.

Series

Fortschritte in der Wissensorganisation; Bd.12