Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981)
0.01
0.010729606 = product of:
0.021459213 = sum of:
0.021459213 = product of:
0.064377636 = sum of:
0.064377636 = weight(_text_:n in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.064377636 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
0.19305801 = queryWeight, product of:
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.044775832 = queryNorm
0.33346266 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.3116565 = idf(docFreq=1611, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results
