Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Stock, W.G.: Informetrische Untersuchungsmethoden auf der Grundlage der Textwortmethode (1984) 0.00 
    0.004736151 = product of:
  0.011840377 = sum of:
    0.005572672 = weight(_text_:s in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.005572672 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.14414869 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
    0.0062677055 = weight(_text_:a in 721) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0062677055 = score(doc=721,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 721, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=721)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Source
    International classification. 11(1984) no.3, S.151-157
    Type
    a
  2. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981) 0.00 
    0.0045704604 = product of:
  0.011426151 = sum of:
    0.0032507253 = weight(_text_:s in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0032507253 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.038659193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
    0.008175425 = weight(_text_:a in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.008175425 = score(doc=13,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.040999193 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035557263 = queryNorm
        0.19940455 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.4 = coord(2/5)
    Abstract
    Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results
    Source
    Nachrichten für Dokumentation. 32(1981) H.4/5, S.162-164
    Type
    a