-
Stock, W.G.: Themenanalytische informetrische Methoden (1990)
0.08
0.08051133 = product of:
0.16102266 = sum of:
0.054727655 = weight(_text_:und in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.054727655 = score(doc=5065,freq=6.0), product of:
0.092166156 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04158434 = queryNorm
0.5937934 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
0.032095086 = weight(_text_:der in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032095086 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.09288972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.04158434 = queryNorm
0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
0.074199915 = product of:
0.22259973 = sum of:
0.22259973 = weight(_text_:psychologie in 5065) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.22259973 = score(doc=5065,freq=2.0), product of:
0.24463055 = queryWeight, product of:
5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
0.04158434 = queryNorm
0.9099425 = fieldWeight in 5065, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
5.8827567 = idf(docFreq=334, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=5065)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(3/6)
- Source
- Psychologie und Philosophie der Grazer Schule: eine Dokumentation zu Werk und Wirkungsgeschichte. Hrsg.: M. Stock und W.G. Stock
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995)
0.02
0.023837373 = product of:
0.07151212 = sum of:
0.039091185 = weight(_text_:und in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.039091185 = score(doc=2443,freq=6.0), product of:
0.092166156 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04158434 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.032420933 = weight(_text_:der in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032420933 = score(doc=2443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.09288972 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.04158434 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.33333334 = coord(2/6)
- Abstract
- Als Maß für die Produktivität und den Einfluß von Forschern, wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen und Fachbereichen dienen häufig anhand von Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen erstellte Ranglisten. Doch nach welchen Kriterien sind die in elektronischen Fachdatenbanken gespeicherten Informationen auszuwerten, um ein einigermaßen zutreffendes Abbild der Forschungsleistung zu erhalten?
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1995, H.11, S.118-121
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation : die Bewertung wissenschaftlicher Forschung und Lehre (1994)
0.01
0.0060184817 = product of:
0.03611089 = sum of:
0.03611089 = weight(_text_:und in 242) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03611089 = score(doc=242,freq=2.0), product of:
0.092166156 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.04158434 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 242, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=242)
0.16666667 = coord(1/6)