Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stock, W.G."
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980) 0.01 
    0.005106006 = product of:
  0.030636035 = sum of:
    0.030636035 = product of:
      0.091908105 = sum of:
        0.091908105 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.091908105 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14846832 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.042397358 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Source
    Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
  2. Stock, W.G.: ¬Die Wichtigkeit wissenschaftlicher Dokumente relativ zu gegebenen Thematiken (1981) 0.01 
    0.005000541 = product of:
  0.030003246 = sum of:
    0.030003246 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 13) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.030003246 = score(doc=13,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12824841 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.042397358 = queryNorm
        0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 13, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=13)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    Scientific documents are more or less important in relation to give subjects and this importance can be measured. An empirical investigation into philosophical information was carried out using a weighting algorithm developed by N. Henrichs which results in a distribution by weighting of documents on an average philosophical subject. With the aid of statistical methods a threshold value can be obtained that separates the important and unimportant documents on a subject. The knowledge of theis threshold value is important for various practical and theoretic questions: providing new possibilities for research strategy in information retrieval; evaluation of the 'titleworthiness' of subjects by comparison of document titles and themes for which the document at hand is important; and making available data on thematic trends for scientific results

Themes