-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsinformatik : Fundierung, Gegenstand und Methoden (1980)
0.01
0.0077447994 = product of:
0.061958395 = sum of:
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.023808768 = product of:
0.047617536 = sum of:
0.047617536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2808) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047617536 = score(doc=2808,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2808, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2808)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Source
- Ratio. 22(1980), S.155-164
-
Stock, W.G.: Informationsmangel trotz Überfluß : Informationsgesellschaft verlangt neue Berufe und Berufsbilder (1995)
0.01
0.0077447994 = product of:
0.061958395 = sum of:
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
0.023808768 = product of:
0.047617536 = sum of:
0.047617536 = weight(_text_:22 in 2027) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.047617536 = score(doc=2027,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07692135 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 2027, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=2027)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Source
- Insider. 1995, Nr.4, Juli, S.19-22
-
Stock, W.G.: Textwortmethode : Norbert Henrichs zum 65. (3) (2000)
0.01
0.007333738 = product of:
0.058669902 = sum of:
0.016519273 = weight(_text_:und in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519273 = score(doc=4891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.025631357 = weight(_text_:der in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025631357 = score(doc=4891,freq=14.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.5223744 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.016519273 = weight(_text_:und in 4891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519273 = score(doc=4891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 4891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=4891)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Nur wenige Dokumentationsmethoden werden mit dem Namen ihrer Entwickler assoziiert. Ausnahmen sind Melvil Dewey (DDC), S.R. Ranganathan (Colon Classification) - und Norbert Henrichs. Seine Textwortmethode ermöglicht die Indexierung und das Retrieval von Literatur aus Fachgebieten, die keine allseits akzeptierte Fachterminologie vorweisen, also viele Sozial- und Geisteswissenschaften, vorneweg die Philosophie. Für den Einsatz in der elektronischen Philosophie-Dokumentation hat Henrichs in den späten sechziger Jahren die Textwortmethode entworfen. Er ist damit nicht nur einer der Pioniere der Anwendung der elektronischen Datenverarbeitung in der Informationspraxis, sondern auch der Pionier bei der Dokumentation terminologisch nicht starrer Fachsprachen
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Medizininformationen : Literaturnachweise, Volltexte und klinische Entscheidungen aus einer Hand (2004)
0.01
0.007318519 = product of:
0.058548152 = sum of:
0.025035689 = weight(_text_:und in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025035689 = score(doc=3288,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
0.008476774 = weight(_text_:der in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008476774 = score(doc=3288,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
0.025035689 = weight(_text_:und in 3288) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025035689 = score(doc=3288,freq=18.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.51424015 = fieldWeight in 3288, product of:
4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
18.0 = termFreq=18.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3288)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Ovid Technologies speist sich aus unterschiedlichen Unternehmensgeschichten; die Erfahrungen von BRS, SilverPlatter, Ovid und Wolters-Kluwer ergänzen sich in den derzeit betriebenen zwei Plattformen Ovid und SilverPlatter. Ovid spricht vor allem praktizierende wie forschende Spezialisten in der medizinisch-biowissenschaftlichen Sparte an, während SilverPlatter eher auf den gesamten akademischen Betrieb abzielt. Wir konzentrieren uns in diesem Artikel auf die Ovid-Plattform und vernachlässigen SilverPlatter. Das Interessante an Ovid ist die Einheit von bibliographischen Nachweisdaten, Volltexten und praxisrelevanten klinischen Entscheidungshilfen. U.E. lohnt die Retrievaloberfläche von Ovid und die hier praktizierte durchgehende Verlinkung von Nachweisen und Volltexten und von Volltexten untereinander einer näheren Betrachtung. Unsere Ergebnisse stützen sich auf den Fragebogen, Gespräche mit Jens Gräßler, National Sales Manager Germany, vom deutschen Ovid-Büro in Berlin sowie auf Tests im März und im April 2004.
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftsevaluation mittels Datenbanken : methodisch einwandfrei? (1995)
0.01
0.0073029813 = product of:
0.05842385 = sum of:
0.02064909 = weight(_text_:und in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064909 = score(doc=2443,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.01712567 = weight(_text_:der in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01712567 = score(doc=2443,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34902605 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.02064909 = weight(_text_:und in 2443) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064909 = score(doc=2443,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 2443, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=2443)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Als Maß für die Produktivität und den Einfluß von Forschern, wissenschaftlichen Einrichtungen und Fachbereichen dienen häufig anhand von Publikations- und Zitationsanalysen erstellte Ranglisten. Doch nach welchen Kriterien sind die in elektronischen Fachdatenbanken gespeicherten Informationen auszuwerten, um ein einigermaßen zutreffendes Abbild der Forschungsleistung zu erhalten?
- Source
- Spektrum der Wissenschaft. 1995, H.11, S.118-121
-
Stock, W.G.: Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung und ihr Einsatz bei Informationsdiensten für Nachrichten (2007)
0.01
0.0069605657 = product of:
0.055684526 = sum of:
0.023603875 = weight(_text_:und in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023603875 = score(doc=151,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.008476774 = weight(_text_:der in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008476774 = score(doc=151,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.023603875 = weight(_text_:und in 151) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.023603875 = score(doc=151,freq=16.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.4848303 = fieldWeight in 151, product of:
4.0 = tf(freq=16.0), with freq of:
16.0 = termFreq=16.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=151)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Themenentdeckung und -verfolgung (topic detection and tracking; TDT) fasst unterschiedliche Dokumente zu einem Thema zusammen und bietet dem Nutzer zunächst das Thema und erst in einem zweiten Schritt die einzelnen Dokumente zur Anzeige an. TDT ist nützlich bei Nachrichten sowie bei Blog-Einträgen. Ein bekanntes Beispiel ist Google News. Der Artikel bespricht den Forschungsstand zu TDT und diskutiert den Einsatz von TDT bei News-Informationsdiensten wie z.B. Factiva oder LexisNexis. Dort ist TDT zweifach wichtig: Erstens ist es (analog zu Google News) bei Profildiensten einsetzbar, zweitens ist es möglich, Dokumente zum gleichen Thema in einen Ordner zu klassieren, um bei einer retrospektiven Recherche die Treffermenge geordnet nach unterschiedlichen Themen anzubieten (und dies ohne Nutzung einer Dokumentationssprache).
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 58(2007) H.1, S.41-46
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissensrepräsentation (2014)
0.01
0.0068368 = product of:
0.0546944 = sum of:
0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016859911 = score(doc=5153,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
0.020974576 = weight(_text_:der in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020974576 = score(doc=5153,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42746788 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 5153) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016859911 = score(doc=5153,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5153, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5153)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Wissensrepräsentation thematisiert die Erstellung von Stellvertretern (Repräsentanten bzw. Surrogaten), die die Aboutness eines Dokuments abbilden. Man unterscheidet bei der Wissensrepräsentation zwischen Informationsfiltern (z.B. Wissensordnungen) und Methoden der Informationsverdichtung (z.B. Extracts oder Abstracts).
- Source
- Lexikon der Bibliotheks- und Informationswissenschaft, Band 2, Lieferung 7
-
Stock, W.G.: ¬Der Ort der Bibliotheken und Informationszentren in der Informationsgesellschaft (1995)
0.01
0.0067227143 = product of:
0.053781714 = sum of:
0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 2202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0143061085 = score(doc=2202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2202)
0.025169495 = weight(_text_:der in 2202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025169495 = score(doc=2202,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.5129615 = fieldWeight in 2202, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2202)
0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 2202) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0143061085 = score(doc=2202,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 2202, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2202)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
-
Barth, J.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Gremm, J.; Hartmann, S.; Henkel, M.; Ilhan, A.; Mainka, A.; Meschede, C.; Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaft in der Urbanistik : Teil 1: Konzeptioneller Forschungsrahmen und Methoden (2017)
0.01
0.0066759824 = product of:
0.05340786 = sum of:
0.02064909 = weight(_text_:und in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064909 = score(doc=3730,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
0.012109677 = weight(_text_:der in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012109677 = score(doc=3730,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
0.02064909 = weight(_text_:und in 3730) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02064909 = score(doc=3730,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.42413816 = fieldWeight in 3730, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3730)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Themenheft: Düsseldorfer und Grazer Informationswissenschaft / Gastherausgeber: Wolfgang G. Stock, Christian Schlögl.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 68(2017) H.5/6, S.365-377
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Internet-Suchwerkzeuge im Vergleich (III) : Informationslinguistik und -statistik: AltaVista, FAST und Northern Light (2001)
0.01
0.00654254 = product of:
0.05234032 = sum of:
0.021326289 = weight(_text_:und in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021326289 = score(doc=5578,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.438048 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.009687742 = weight(_text_:der in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.009687742 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.19743896 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.021326289 = weight(_text_:und in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.021326289 = score(doc=5578,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.438048 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Suchmaschinen im World Wide Web arbeiten automatisch: Sie spüren Dokumente auf, indexieren sie, halten die Datenbank (mehr oder minder) aktuell und bieten den Kunden Retrievaloberflächen an. In unserem Known-Item-Retrievaltest (Password 11/2000) schnitten - in dieser Reihenfolge - Google, Alta Vista, Northern Light und FAST (All the Web) am besten ab. Die letzten drei Systeme arbeiten mit einer Kombination aus informationslinguistischen und informationsstatistischen Algorithmen, weshalb wir sie hier gemeinsam besprechen wollen. Im Zentrum unserer informationswissenschaftlichen Analysen stehen die "Highlights" der jeweiligen Suchwerkzeuge
-
Stock, W.G.: Wissenschaftliche Informationen - metawissenschaftlich betrachtet : eine Theorie der wissenschaftlichen Information (1980)
0.01
0.0065004015 = product of:
0.052003212 = sum of:
0.018660503 = weight(_text_:und in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018660503 = score(doc=182,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.014682204 = weight(_text_:der in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014682204 = score(doc=182,freq=6.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29922754 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.018660503 = weight(_text_:und in 182) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018660503 = score(doc=182,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 182, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=182)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Thema der Untersuchung ist die meta-wissenschaftliche Betrachtung von Informationen in den Wissenschaften. ... Der grundlegende Term "Information" wird so allgemein definiert, daß alle bis heute bekannten Definitionsvarianten (die oftmasl disziplinspezifisch ausgerichtet sind) aus diesem Term ableitbar sind. "Information" wird dabei als das Gesamt von "Signal" (materieller Aspekt) und "Informen" (ideeller Aspekt) betrachtet.
- RSWK
- Information und Dokumentation (GBV)
Information und Dokumentation / Theorie (BVB)
- Subject
- Information und Dokumentation (GBV)
Information und Dokumentation / Theorie (BVB)
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Klassifikation und terminologische Kontrolle : Yahoo!, Open Directory und Oingo im Vergleich (2000)
0.01
0.0064812703 = product of:
0.051850162 = sum of:
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 5496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=5496,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5496, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5496)
0.013700536 = weight(_text_:der in 5496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013700536 = score(doc=5496,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 5496, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5496)
0.019074813 = weight(_text_:und in 5496) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019074813 = score(doc=5496,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.39180204 = fieldWeight in 5496, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5496)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- In Password 11/2000 wurden durch einen Retrievaltest die qualitativ führenden Suchwerkzeuge im Internet bestimmt. In den nächsten Teilen unseres State of the Art - Berichts über Retrievalsysteme im World Wide Weh beschreiben wir einzelne interessante Ansätze der Technik der TopSuchwerkzeuge. Den Anfang machen die klassifikatorischen Verzeichnisse Yahoo! und das Open Directory-Projekt sowie das System Oingo, das im Rahmen eines "semantischen Retrievals" das Homonym- und Synonymproblem angeht
-
Stock, M.; Stock, W.G.: Was ist Informationswissenschaft? (2012)
0.01
0.006163622 = product of:
0.049308974 = sum of:
0.018660503 = weight(_text_:und in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018660503 = score(doc=3326,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.011987969 = weight(_text_:der in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011987969 = score(doc=3326,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.24431825 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.018660503 = weight(_text_:und in 3326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018660503 = score(doc=3326,freq=10.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38329202 = fieldWeight in 3326, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3326)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Am 26. November 1987 hielt Wolf Rauch seine akademische Antrittsrede an der Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz (Rauch 1988). Sein Thema: Was ist Informationswissenschaft? Mit Rauchs Professur beginnt in Österreich die institutionalisierte Informationswissenschaft, war Rauchs Institut doch das erste seiner Art in diesem Land (Rauch/Schlögl 2009). Seit diesem Ereignis sind 25 Jahre vergangen. Wo steht Informationswissenschaft heute?
- Content
- Wie kann man "Informationswissenschaft" abgrenzen? Was ist Informationswissenschaft? Wie kann man diese noch recht junge wissenschaftliche Disziplin definieren? Für die Beschreibung und Abgrenzung von Informationswissenschaft werden wir einige Anläufe machen und folgende Fragestellungen abarbeiten: Welches sind die wesentlichen Bestimmungsstücke und Aufgaben der Informationswissenschaft? Welche Rolle spielen Wissen und Information? Wie hat sich unsere Wissenschaft entwickelt? Haben die informationswissenschaftlichen Teildisziplinen unterschiedliche Geschichten? Mit welchen anderen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen ist die Informationswissenschaft eng verknüpft?
- Source
- Informationswissenschaft: Begegnungen mit Wolf Rauch. Herausgegeben von Otto Petrovic, Gerhard Reichmann und Christian Schlögl
-
Stock, W.G.: Eugene Garfield und die Folgen : der Weg der Fußnote bis in die Wissenschaftspolitik (2002)
0.01
0.0061453776 = product of:
0.04916302 = sum of:
0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0143061085 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.020550804 = weight(_text_:der in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.020550804 = score(doc=472,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.4188313 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 472) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0143061085 = score(doc=472,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 472, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=472)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
-
Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaft interdisziplinär (2012)
0.01
0.005842385 = product of:
0.04673908 = sum of:
0.016519273 = weight(_text_:und in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519273 = score(doc=559,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
0.013700536 = weight(_text_:der in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.013700536 = score(doc=559,freq=4.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.27922085 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
0.016519273 = weight(_text_:und in 559) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016519273 = score(doc=559,freq=6.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.33931053 = fieldWeight in 559, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=559)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Einleitungsartikel zu einem Themenheft. Informationswissenschaft umfasst als Kerndisziplinen Information Retrieval, Wissensrepräsentation, Informetrie (einschließlich Web Science), Wissensmanagement und die Erforschung von Informations- bzw. Wissensgesellschaft und der Informationsmärkte (Stock & Stock, 2012). In vielen Forschungsprojekten befassen sich Informationswissenschaftler mit Themen, die auch von anderen Wissenschaftsdisziplinen bearbeitet werden. Informationswissenschaft ist also durchaus (auch) eine interdisziplinäre Angelegenheit. Dieses Themenheft von IWP stellt die Interdisziplinarität von Informationswissenschaft anhand von Beispielen der Forschungsergebnisse aus Düsseldorf in den Vordergrund.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 63(2012) H.4, S.215-216
-
Stock, W.G.: Textwortmethode (2000)
0.01
0.0057286876 = product of:
0.0458295 = sum of:
0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016859911 = score(doc=3408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
0.012109677 = weight(_text_:der in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012109677 = score(doc=3408,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 3408) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016859911 = score(doc=3408,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 3408, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=3408)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Imprint
- Düsseldorf : Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek
- Series
- Schriften der Universitäts- und Landesbibliothek Düsseldorf; 32
-
Barth, J.; Fietkiewicz, K.J.; Gremm, J.; Hartmann, S.; Henkel, M.; Ilhan, A.; Mainka, A.; Meschede, C.; Peters, I.; Stock, W.G.: Informationswissenschaft in der Urbanistik : Teil 2: Erste empirische Ergebnisse zu smarten Städten (2018)
0.01
0.0057286876 = product of:
0.0458295 = sum of:
0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016859911 = score(doc=5020,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
0.012109677 = weight(_text_:der in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012109677 = score(doc=5020,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.2467987 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
0.016859911 = weight(_text_:und in 5020) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016859911 = score(doc=5020,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34630734 = fieldWeight in 5020, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5020)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Footnote
- Teil eines Themenheftes: Themenheft: Düsseldorfer und Grazer Informationswissenschaft / Gastherausgeber: Wolfgang G. Stock, Christian Schlögl.
- Source
- Information - Wissenschaft und Praxis. 69(2018) H.1, S.31-46
-
Stock, W.G.: Bibliothekarische Dienstleistungen als Universaldienste in der Informationsgesellschaft (1997)
0.01
0.005392979 = product of:
0.04314383 = sum of:
0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0143061085 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
0.014531613 = weight(_text_:der in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014531613 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29615843 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
0.0143061085 = weight(_text_:und in 919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0143061085 = score(doc=919,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.29385152 = fieldWeight in 919, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=919)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Series
- Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie: Sonderh.68
-
Stock, W.G.: Professionelle Informationsvermittlung in einer Öffentlichen Bibliothek : StadtBibliothek Köln (1999)
0.01
0.005319815 = product of:
0.04255852 = sum of:
0.011801938 = weight(_text_:und in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011801938 = score(doc=3540,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
0.018954644 = weight(_text_:der in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.018954644 = score(doc=3540,freq=10.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
0.011801938 = weight(_text_:und in 3540) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.011801938 = score(doc=3540,freq=4.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.24241515 = fieldWeight in 3540, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3540)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Wenn ein Unternehmen oder eine Forschungseinrichtung externe Informationen benötigt, so gibt es eine interne Lösung, die Einrichtung entsprechender informationswirtschaftlicher Infrastruktur, sowie das Outsourcing, derzeit meist das Ansprechen eines professionellen Information Broker. Gibt es bei der externen Lösung Alternativen, insbesondere der kostengünstigen Art? Wenn eine Privatperson ein Informationsproblem hat, wer fungiert als professioneller Ansprechpartner? Zur Zeit gibt es nur wenige für jedermann bezahlbare Möglichkeiten, sich Informationen aus kommerzeillen Online-Archiven beschaffen zu lassen oder selbst zu recherchieren. Aber gibt es denn dan nicht eine Institution, die eigentlich seit ihren Anfängen für Informationsvermittlung zuständig ist? Und die diese Aufgabe - ebenfalls seit ihren Anfängen - kostenlos durchführt, und dies für jedermann? Der 'Auskunftsdienst' der Bibliotheken ist in der Tat eine solche Einrichtung
-
Stock, W.G.: Verkaufte Suchwörter, verkaufte Links : Retrieval nach Homepages optimiert? (1999)
0.01
0.005232212 = product of:
0.041857697 = sum of:
0.016690461 = weight(_text_:und in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016690461 = score(doc=4142,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.008476774 = weight(_text_:der in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008476774 = score(doc=4142,freq=2.0), product of:
0.049067024 = queryWeight, product of:
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.17275909 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.016690461 = weight(_text_:und in 4142) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016690461 = score(doc=4142,freq=8.0), product of:
0.04868482 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021966046 = queryNorm
0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 4142, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4142)
0.125 = coord(3/24)
- Abstract
- Selten wurde ein Dienst so stark diskutiert wie 'RealNames', da sowohl seine Suchwörter als auch die darauf aufsetzenden Links auf Homepages verkauft werden. Machen wir uns doch nichts vor: Das WWW ist ein kommerzielles Unternehmen, die Dienstleistungen müssen finanziert werden. Und warum soll nicht ein Privatunternehmen mit Inhaltserschließung Gewinne erzielen? RealNames mit seinem 'Internet Keyword System' ist eine interessante Idee, das Retrieval nach Homepages zielgenau durchzuführen. Was bringt RealNames den Nutzern? Wann sollte jemand, der Sites im WWW unterhält, Suchwörter und Links bei RealNames abonnieren (und was kostet das)? Im Oktober 1999 haben wir RealNames genauer angeschaut. Analysiert wurde das gezielte Retrieval nach Homepages bei AltaVista, Fireball und bei RealNames.com
