Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Strotmann, A."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Information science during the first decade of the web : an enriched author cocitation analysis (2008) 0.01
    0.0059868526 = product of:
      0.044901393 = sum of:
        0.038981467 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.038981467 = score(doc=1720,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.29862255 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
        0.005919926 = product of:
          0.011839852 = sum of:
            0.011839852 = weight(_text_:information in 1720) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.011839852 = score(doc=1720,freq=8.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.23274569 = fieldWeight in 1720, product of:
                  2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                    8.0 = termFreq=8.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1720)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Using an enriched author cocitation analysis (ACA), we map information science (IS) for 1996-2005, a decade of explosive development of the World Wide Web, to examine its development since the landmark study by White and McCain (1998). The Web, we find, has had a profound impact on IS, driving the creation of new disciplines and revitalization or obsolescence of old, and most importantly, bridging the chasm between the literatures and retrieval IS camps. Simultaneously, the development of IS towards cognitive aspects has intensified. Our study enriches classic ACA in that it employs both orthogonal and oblique rotations in the factor analysis (FA), and reports both pattern and structure matrices for the latter, thus enabling a comparison between these several FA methods in ACA. Each method provides interesting information not available from the others, we find, especially when results are also visualized in the novel manner we introduce here.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.6, S.916-937
  2. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Evolution of research activities and intellectual influences in information science 1996-2005 : introducing author bibliographic-coupling analysis (2008) 0.00
    0.0049009197 = product of:
      0.036756895 = sum of:
        0.032484557 = weight(_text_:informationswissenschaft in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.032484557 = score(doc=2384,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.13053758 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.028978055 = queryNorm
            0.24885213 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.504705 = idf(docFreq=1328, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
        0.004272339 = product of:
          0.008544678 = sum of:
            0.008544678 = weight(_text_:information in 2384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.008544678 = score(doc=2384,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 2384, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2384)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.13333334 = coord(2/15)
    
    Abstract
    Author cocitation analysis (ACA) has frequently been applied over the last two decades for mapping the intellectual structure of a research field as represented by its authors. However, what is mapped in ACA is actually the structure of intellectual influences on a research field as perceived by its active authors. In this exploratory paper, by contrast, we introduce author bibliographic-coupling analysis (ABCA) as a method to map the research activities of active authors themselves for a more realistic picture of the current state of research in a field. We choose the information science (IS) field and study its intellectual structure both in terms of current research activities as seen from ABCA and in terms of intellectual influences on its research as shown from ACA. We examine how these two aspects of the intellectual structure of the IS field are related, and how they both developed during the first decade of the Web, 1996-2005. We find that these two citation-based author-mapping methods complement each other, and that, in combination, they provide a more comprehensive view of the intellectual structure of the IS field than either of them can provide on its own.
    Field
    Informationswissenschaft
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.13, S.2070-2086
  3. Zhao, D.; Strotmann, A.: Can citation analysis of Web publications better detect research fronts? (2007) 0.00
    1.6444239E-4 = product of:
      0.0024666358 = sum of:
        0.0024666358 = product of:
          0.0049332716 = sum of:
            0.0049332716 = weight(_text_:information in 471) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0049332716 = score(doc=471,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.050870337 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.028978055 = queryNorm
                0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 471, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=471)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.06666667 = coord(1/15)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.9, S.1285-1302