Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stuckenschmidt, H."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × theme_ss:"Visualisierung"
  1. Pfeffer, M.; Eckert, K.; Stuckenschmidt, H.: Visual analysis of classification systems and library collections (2008) 0.02
    0.016503442 = product of:
      0.045384467 = sum of:
        0.007251961 = product of:
          0.014503922 = sum of:
            0.014503922 = weight(_text_:h in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.014503922 = score(doc=317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.21959636 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.005411029 = weight(_text_:a in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005411029 = score(doc=317,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.17652355 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
        0.0027776284 = weight(_text_:s in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0027776284 = score(doc=317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
        0.02994385 = weight(_text_:k in 317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02994385 = score(doc=317,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.31552678 = fieldWeight in 317, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=317)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    In this demonstration we present a visual analysis approach that addresses both developers and users of hierarchical classification systems. The approach supports an intuitive understanding of the structure and current use in relation to a specific collection. We will also demonstrate its application for the development and management of library collections.
    Pages
    S.436-439
    Type
    a
  2. Eckert, K.; Pfeffer, M.; Stuckenschmidt, H.: Assessing thesaurus-based annotations for semantic search applications (2008) 0.02
    0.01515366 = product of:
      0.041672565 = sum of:
        0.006345466 = product of:
          0.012690932 = sum of:
            0.012690932 = weight(_text_:h in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012690932 = score(doc=1528,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.0660481 = queryWeight, product of:
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.026584605 = queryNorm
                0.19214681 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
        0.006695806 = weight(_text_:a in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.006695806 = score(doc=1528,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.030653298 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.21843673 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
        0.0024304248 = weight(_text_:s in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0024304248 = score(doc=1528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.028903782 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
        0.02620087 = weight(_text_:k in 1528) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.02620087 = score(doc=1528,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.09490114 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.026584605 = queryNorm
            0.27608594 = fieldWeight in 1528, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1528)
      0.36363637 = coord(4/11)
    
    Abstract
    Statistical methods for automated document indexing are becoming an alternative to the manual assignment of keywords. We argue that the quality of the thesaurus used as a basis for indexing in regard to its ability to adequately cover the contents to be indexed and as a basis for the specific indexing method used is of crucial importance in automatic indexing. We present an interactive tool for thesaurus evaluation that is based on a combination of statistical measures and appropriate visualisation techniques that supports the detection of potential problems in a thesaurus. We describe the methods used and show that the tool supports the detection and correction of errors, leading to a better indexing result.
    Source
    International Journal of Metadata, Semantics and Ontologies. 3(2008) no.1, S.53-67
    Type
    a

Authors