Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- compass's%3a%20information retrieval %2f use of %2f on-line computers%22 2
- compass's%3a%20information retrieval %2f use of %2f on-like computers%22 2
- compass's%3a%20information retrieval %2f use of %2f on-life computers%22 2
- compass's%3a%20information retrieval %2f use of %2f on-link computers%22 2
- compass's%3a%20information retrieval %2f use of %2f on-linie computers%22 2
-
Studwell, W.E.; Rast, E.K.: Format integration and spatial data : a preliminary view (1993)
0.00
0.002415504 = product of: 0.019324033 = sum of: 0.019324033 = weight(_text_:of in 6698) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.019324033 = score(doc=6698,freq=6.0), product of: 0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of: 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.041294612 = queryNorm 0.2992506 = fieldWeight in 6698, product of: 2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of: 6.0 = termFreq=6.0 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6698) 0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Provides a brief history and explains the principle of format integration. Gives 2 examples of monographic map records taken from the OCLC database. Explains significant or substantial differences between the present fixed fields and the projected fields for both these examples
- Source
- Western Association of Map Libraries information bulletin. 24(1993) no.3, S.186-188
-
Studwell, W.E.: Format integration : the most invisible new major change in cataloging (1995)
0.00
0.0013945919 = product of: 0.011156735 = sum of: 0.011156735 = weight(_text_:of in 4440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.011156735 = score(doc=4440,freq=2.0), product of: 0.06457475 = queryWeight, product of: 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.041294612 = queryNorm 0.17277241 = fieldWeight in 4440, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218) 0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4440) 0.125 = coord(1/8)
- Abstract
- Discusses USMARC format integration, which officially took place in early 1995. Provides a short background to the development of bibliographic systms for online databases in the late 1960s and early 1970s, explaining the need for simplifying online catalog format standards