Search (8 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Stvilia, B."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Huang, H.; Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.; Bass, H.W.: Prioritization of data quality dimensions and skills requirements in genome annotation work (2012) 0.02 
    0.019354446 = product of:
  0.03870889 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 4971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=4971,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4971, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4971)
    0.009055263 = product of:
      0.018110527 = sum of:
        0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4971) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018110527 = score(doc=4971,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4971, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4971)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    The rapid accumulation of genome annotations, as well as their widespread reuse in clinical and scientific practice, poses new challenges to management of the quality of scientific data. This study contributes towards better understanding of scientists' perceptions of and priorities for data quality and data quality assurance skills needed in genome annotation. This study was guided by a previously developed general framework for assessment of data quality and by a taxonomy of data-quality (DQ) skills, and intended to define context-sensitive models of criteria for data quality and skills for genome annotation. Analysis of the results revealed that genomics scientists recognize specific sets of criteria for quality in the genome-annotation context. Seventeen data quality dimensions were reduced to 5-factor constructs, and 17 relevant skills were grouped into 4-factor constructs. The constructs defined by this study advance the understanding of data quality relationships and are an important contribution to data and information quality research. In addition, the resulting models can serve as valuable resources to genome data curators and administrators for developing data-curation policies and designing DQ-assurance strategies, processes, procedures, and infrastructure. The study's findings may also inform educators in developing data quality assurance curricula and training courses.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.1, S.195-207
  2. Stvilia, B.; Wu, S.; Lee, D.J.: Researchers' uses of and disincentives for sharing their research identity information in research information management systems (2018) 0.02 
    0.019354446 = product of:
  0.03870889 = sum of:
    0.029653627 = weight(_text_:management in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.029653627 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
    0.009055263 = product of:
      0.018110527 = sum of:
        0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4373) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018110527 = score(doc=4373,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4373, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4373)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.8, S.1035-1045
  3. Lee, D.J.L.; Stvilia, B.: Developing a data identifier taxonomy (2014) 0.02 
    0.01797656 = product of:
  0.07190624 = sum of:
    0.07190624 = weight(_text_:management in 1976) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.07190624 = score(doc=1976,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.15925534 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.047248192 = queryNorm
        0.45151538 = fieldWeight in 1976, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1976)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    As the amount of research data management is growing, the use of identity metadata for discovering, linking, and citing research data is growing too. To support the awareness of different identifier systems and the comparison and selection of an identifier for a particular data management environment, there is need for a knowledge base. This article contributes to that goal and analyzes the data management and related literatures to develop a data identifier taxonomy. The taxonomy includes four categories (domain, entity types, activities, and quality dimensions). In addition, the article describes 14 identifiers referenced in the literature and analyzes them along the taxonomy.
  4. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Schindler, K.; Worrall, A.; Burnett, G.; Burnett, K.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Composition of scientific teams and publication productivity at a national science lab (2011) 0.02 
    0.015843935 = product of:
  0.06337574 = sum of:
    0.06337574 = sum of:
      0.031368356 = weight(_text_:science in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.031368356 = score(doc=4191,freq=6.0), product of:
          0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.25204095 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
            2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
              6.0 = termFreq=6.0
            2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
      0.03200739 = weight(_text_:22 in 4191) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.03200739 = score(doc=4191,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16545512 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.047248192 = queryNorm
          0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4191, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4191)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The production of scientific knowledge has evolved from a process of inquiry largely based on the activities of individual scientists to one grounded in the collaborative efforts of specialized research teams. This shift brings to light a new question: how the composition of scientific teams affects their production of knowledge. This study employs data from 1,415 experiments conducted at the National High Magnetic Field Laboratory (NHMFL) between 2005 and 2008 to identify and select a sample of 89 teams and examine whether team diversity and network characteristics affect productivity. The study examines how the diversity of science teams along several variables affects overall team productivity. Results indicate several diversity measures associated with network position and team productivity. Teams with mixed institutional associations were more central to the overall network compared with teams that primarily comprised NHMFL's own scientists. Team cohesion was positively related to productivity. The study indicates that high productivity in teams is associated with high disciplinary diversity and low seniority diversity of team membership. Finally, an increase in the share of senior members negatively affects productivity, and teams with members in central structural positions perform better than other teams.
    Date
    22. 1.2011 13:19:42
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.2, S.270-283
  5. Choi, W.; Stvilia, B.: Web credibility assessment : conceptualization, operationalization, variability, and models (2015) 0.00 
    0.004482127 = product of:
  0.017928507 = sum of:
    0.017928507 = product of:
      0.035857014 = sum of:
        0.035857014 = weight(_text_:science in 2469) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.035857014 = score(doc=2469,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.2881068 = fieldWeight in 2469, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2469)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Series
    Advances in information science
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.12, S.2399-2414
  6. Jörgensen, C.; Stvilia, B.; Wu, S.: Assessing the relationships among tag syntax, semantics, and perceived usefulness (2014) 0.00 
    0.002716579 = product of:
  0.010866316 = sum of:
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 1244) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=1244,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1244, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1244)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.836-849
  7. Stvilia, B.; Hinnant, C.C.; Wu, S.; Worrall, A.; Lee, D.J.; Burnett, K.; Burnett, G.; Kazmer, M.M.; Marty, P.F.: Research project tasks, data, and perceptions of data quality in a condensed matter physics community (2015) 0.00 
    0.002716579 = product of:
  0.010866316 = sum of:
    0.010866316 = product of:
      0.021732632 = sum of:
        0.021732632 = weight(_text_:science in 1631) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021732632 = score(doc=1631,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.17461908 = fieldWeight in 1631, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1631)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.246-263
  8. Stvilia, B.; Jörgensen, C.: Member activities and quality of tags in a collection of historical photographs in Flickr (2010) 0.00 
    0.0022638158 = product of:
  0.009055263 = sum of:
    0.009055263 = product of:
      0.018110527 = sum of:
        0.018110527 = weight(_text_:science in 4117) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018110527 = score(doc=4117,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.124457374 = queryWeight, product of:
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.047248192 = queryNorm
            0.1455159 = fieldWeight in 4117, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4117)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 61(2010) no.12, S.2477-2489

Authors

Themes