Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sud, P."
  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  1. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.00 
    0.0020646858 = product of:
  0.018582173 = sum of:
    0.0136091355 = product of:
      0.027218271 = sum of:
        0.027218271 = weight(_text_:networks in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.027218271 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10416738 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.022023074 = queryNorm
            0.26129362 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.72992 = idf(docFreq=1060, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    0.004973038 = product of:
      0.014919113 = sum of:
        0.014919113 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.014919113 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07712106 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.022023074 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.11111111 = coord(2/18)
    Abstract
    Webometric network analyses have been used to map the connectivity of groups of websites to identify clusters, important sites or overall structure. Such analyses have mainly been based upon hyperlink counts, the number of hyperlinks between a pair of websites, although some have used title mentions or URL citations instead. The ability to automatically gather hyperlink counts from Yahoo! ceased in April 2011 and the ability to manually gather such counts was due to cease by early 2012, creating a need for alternatives. This article assesses URL citations and title mentions as possible replacements for hyperlinks in both binary and weighted direct link and co-inlink network diagrams. It also assesses three different types of data for the network connections: hit count estimates, counts of matching URLs, and filtered counts of matching URLs. Results from analyses of U.S. library and information science departments and U.K. universities give evidence that metrics based upon URLs or titles can be appropriate replacements for metrics based upon hyperlinks for both binary and weighted networks, although filtered counts of matching URLs are necessary to give the best results for co-title mention and co-URL citation network diagrams.
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
  2. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Vis, F.: Commenting on YouTube videos : From guatemalan rock to El Big Bang (2012) 0.00 
    4.1818162E-4 = product of:
  0.007527269 = sum of:
    0.007527269 = product of:
      0.015054538 = sum of:
        0.015054538 = weight(_text_:29 in 63) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.015054538 = score(doc=63,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07747029 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.022023074 = queryNorm
            0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 63, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=63)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    Abstract
    YouTube is one of the world's most popular websites and hosts numerous amateur and professional videos. Comments on these videos might be researched to give insights into audience reactions to important issues or particular videos. Yet, little is known about YouTube discussions in general: how frequent they are, who typically participates, and the role of sentiment. This article fills this gap through an analysis of large samples of text comments on YouTube videos. The results identify patterns and give some benchmarks against which future YouTube research into individual videos can be compared. For instance, the typical YouTube comment was mildly positive, was posted by a 29-year-old male, and contained 58 characters. About 23% of comments in the complete comment sets were replies to previous comments. There was no typical density of discussion on YouTube videos in the sense of the proportion of replies to other comments: videos with both few and many replies were common. The YouTube audience engaged with each other disproportionately when making negative comments, however; positive comments elicited few replies. The biggest trigger of discussion seemed to be religion, whereas the videos attracting the least discussion were predominantly from the Music, Comedy, and How to & Style categories. This suggests different audience uses for YouTube, from passive entertainment to active debating.
  3. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 0.00 
    3.3153585E-4 = product of:
  0.005967645 = sum of:
    0.005967645 = product of:
      0.017902935 = sum of:
        0.017902935 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017902935 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.07712106 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.022023074 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.055555556 = coord(1/18)
    Date
    16.11.2016 11:07:22

Authors