Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Sud, P."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 0.05 
    0.051234484 = product of:
  0.10246897 = sum of:
    0.10246897 = sum of:
      0.06051598 = weight(_text_:2004 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.06051598 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.21705271 = queryWeight, product of:
            4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051607955 = queryNorm
          0.27880776 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            4.2057996 = idf(docFreq=1791, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
      0.04195299 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04195299 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.051607955 = queryNorm
          0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Scientists and managers using citation-based indicators to help evaluate research cannot evaluate recent articles because of the time needed for citations to accrue. Reading occurs before citing, however, and so it makes sense to count readers rather than citations for recent publications. To assess this, Mendeley readers and citations were obtained for articles from 2004 to late 2014 in five broad categories (agriculture, business, decision science, pharmacy, and the social sciences) and 50 subcategories. In these areas, citation counts tended to increase with every extra year since publication, and readership counts tended to increase faster initially but then stabilize after about 5 years. The correlation between citations and readers was also higher for longer time periods, stabilizing after about 5 years. Although there were substantial differences between broad fields and smaller differences between subfields, the results confirm the value of Mendeley reader counts as early scientific impact indicators.
    Date
    16.11.2016 11:07:22
  2. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.01 
    0.008740207 = product of:
  0.017480414 = sum of:
    0.017480414 = product of:
      0.03496083 = sum of:
        0.03496083 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03496083 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.18072227 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.051607955 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22

Authors