Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Suominen, V."
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Friman, M.; Jansson, P.; Suominen, V.: Chaos or order? : Aby Warburg's library of cultural history and its classification (1995) 0.03 
    0.028787265 = product of:
  0.05757453 = sum of:
    0.05757453 = sum of:
      0.007654148 = weight(_text_:a in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.007654148 = score(doc=1089,freq=4.0), product of:
          0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.14413087 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
            2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
              4.0 = termFreq=4.0
            1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
      0.04992038 = weight(_text_:22 in 1089) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
        0.04992038 = score(doc=1089,freq=2.0), product of:
          0.16128273 = queryWeight, product of:
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.046056706 = queryNorm
          0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 1089, product of:
            1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
              2.0 = termFreq=2.0
            3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
            0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1089)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    The classification system of the Warburg Institute library, London, UK, is considered. First, a brief review of the scholary work of Aby Warburg and the history of this library is given to illustrate the background of the classification. The classification is described and its basic features are clarified with examples. Finally, the classification of the Warburg Institute library is contrasted with ordinary classification thinking in library and information science
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 22(1995) no.1, S.23-29
    Type
    a
  2. Suominen, V.: Linguistic / semiotic conditions of information retrieval / documentation in the light of a sausurean conception of language : 'organising knowledge' or 'communication concerning documents'? (1998) 0.00 
    0.0024857575 = product of:
  0.004971515 = sum of:
    0.004971515 = product of:
      0.00994303 = sum of:
        0.00994303 = weight(_text_:a in 81) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00994303 = score(doc=81,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.18723148 = fieldWeight in 81, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=81)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Argumentation consists of representation of the basic structuralist concepts of language/semiotic as a two-level form, as a form of expression and here especially form of content, and of application of these concepts to the phenomena of the representation of the contents of documents. On the basis of argumentation the paper questions the notion of "organizing knowledge", is it, or in what sense it is possible to organize knowledge. The paper bings out some reservations to viewing content representation as organizing knowledge in a strong sense and suggests that instead could be used a notion of (meta)documentation, characterized as communication concerning documents
    Type
    a

Authors