Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  • × theme_ss:"Inhaltsanalyse"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994) 0.04 
    0.036628757 = product of:
  0.08790902 = sum of:
    0.009566996 = weight(_text_:information in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009566996 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.0616574 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
    0.02188741 = weight(_text_:for in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.02188741 = score(doc=8263,freq=8.0), product of:
        0.06594466 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.33190575 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
          2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
            8.0 = termFreq=8.0
          1.8775425 = idf(docFreq=18385, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
    0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018929742 = score(doc=8263,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
    0.018595127 = weight(_text_:of in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018595127 = score(doc=8263,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
    0.018929742 = weight(_text_:the in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018929742 = score(doc=8263,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.34159598 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
  0.41666666 = coord(5/12)
    Abstract
    An examination of some nonbook materials with respect to an aboutness model of indexing leads to the conclusion that there are instances that defy subject indexing. These occur not so much because of the nature of the medium per se but because it is being used for nondocumentary purposes, or, when being used for such purposes, the subject referenced is nonlexical
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606
  2. Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993) 0.01 
    0.013856318 = product of:
  0.05542527 = sum of:
    0.020286093 = weight(_text_:the in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020286093 = score(doc=5612,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.36607194 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
    0.0148530835 = weight(_text_:of in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.0148530835 = score(doc=5612,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.054923624 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.2704316 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
    0.020286093 = weight(_text_:the in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020286093 = score(doc=5612,freq=18.0), product of:
        0.05541559 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.035122856 = queryNorm
        0.36607194 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
          4.2426405 = tf(freq=18.0), with freq of:
            18.0 = termFreq=18.0
          1.5777643 = idf(docFreq=24812, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
  0.25 = coord(3/12)
    Abstract
    Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis