Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f université%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelnen deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%aendern und einzelnen bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
- rvk_ss%3a%2200 80852 allgemeines %2f buch- und bibliothekswesen%2c informationswissenschaft %2f bibliothekswesen %2f bibliothekswesen in einzelnen L%c3%andern und einzelne bibliotheken %2f einzelne deutsche bibliotheken %2f bibliotheken S %2f stuttgart %2f university%c3%A4tsbibliothek hohenheim%22 2
-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.00
5.43019E-4 = product of: 0.008145284 = sum of: 0.0061733257 = weight(_text_:in in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0061733257 = score(doc=5612,freq=8.0), product of: 0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of: 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.021569785 = queryNorm 0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of: 2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of: 8.0 = termFreq=8.0 1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612) 0.0019719584 = weight(_text_:s in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.0019719584 = score(doc=5612,freq=2.0), product of: 0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.021569785 = queryNorm 0.08408674 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612) 0.06666667 = coord(2/30)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 16(1993) no.2, S.5-40
-
Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994)
0.00
7.512224E-5 = product of: 0.002253667 = sum of: 0.002253667 = weight(_text_:s in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.002253667 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of: 0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of: 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.021569785 = queryNorm 0.09609913 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218) 0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263) 0.033333335 = coord(1/30)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606