Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Svenonius, E.; Baughman, B.; Molto, M.: Title page sanctity? : the distribution of access points in a sample of English language monographs (1986) 0.01 
    0.014334068 = product of:
  0.05733627 = sum of:
    0.05733627 = product of:
      0.17200881 = sum of:
        0.17200881 = weight(_text_:editors in 361) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.17200881 = score(doc=361,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.386509 = queryWeight, product of:
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.057573788 = queryNorm
            0.44503185 = fieldWeight in 361, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              6.7132807 = idf(docFreq=145, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=361)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    The problem addressed in this paper is that of simplifying access point determination. A critique is made of the simple, mechanical rule whereby every name appearing in certain designatable locations within a publication qualifies as an access point. Then a more acceptable version of the every-name-an-access-point rule is tested empirically against a sample of 400 English language monographs. Conclusions reached concern (1) the responsibility profiles of these monographs, i.e., how many authors, editors, illustrators and emanators are typically associated with them and in what combinations, and (2) the relative productivity of different locations within them, e.g., title pages and tables of contents, as sources of access points. The study was conceived to be exploratory in nature and its findings suggest further research that could be done to provide empirical validation for rules for access point determination.
  2. Svenonius, E.; Witthus, R.: Information science as a profession (1981) 0.01 
    0.011089081 = product of:
  0.044356324 = sum of:
    0.044356324 = weight(_text_:information in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.044356324 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.43886948 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.291-317
  3. Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988) 0.01 
    0.0055445405 = product of:
  0.022178162 = sum of:
    0.022178162 = weight(_text_:information in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022178162 = score(doc=762,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.21943474 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
    Source
    Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
  4. Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986) 0.00 
    0.003920582 = product of:
  0.015682328 = sum of:
    0.015682328 = weight(_text_:information in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.015682328 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.10106951 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.057573788 = queryNorm
        0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986) no.5, S.331-340

Authors

Themes