Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Svenonius, E."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[2000 TO 2010}
  1. McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An interview with Elaine Svenonius (2000) 0.02
    0.018560153 = product of:
      0.055680454 = sum of:
        0.029435357 = weight(_text_:use in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.029435357 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10875683 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.27065295 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.0620887 = idf(docFreq=5623, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
        0.013296372 = weight(_text_:of in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013296372 = score(doc=5356,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.23940048 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
        0.012948724 = product of:
          0.038846172 = sum of:
            0.038846172 = weight(_text_:29 in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038846172 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    In an interview with Dorothy McGarry, Elaine Svenonius discusses her many-faceted career. Topics include her research interests in subject and descriptive cataloging (Svenonius notes that it "takes some untangling of vocabulary and semantics to see that the traditional bifurcation separating subject and descriptive cataloging is artificial"); her teaching experience, especially her use of Andrew Osborn's "active learning" seminar method; and her views about the development of information science and its relationship to librarianship.
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 29(2000) no.4, S.5-18
  2. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01
    0.013742527 = product of:
      0.04122758 = sum of:
        0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021543756 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
        0.009972278 = weight(_text_:of in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009972278 = score(doc=5599,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
        0.009711544 = product of:
          0.029134631 = sum of:
            0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 5599) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029134631 = score(doc=5599,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5599, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5599)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  3. Svenonius, E.: LCSH: semantics, syntax and specifity (2000) 0.01
    0.013742527 = product of:
      0.04122758 = sum of:
        0.021543756 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.021543756 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.20052543 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
        0.009972278 = weight(_text_:of in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.009972278 = score(doc=5602,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.17955035 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
        0.009711544 = product of:
          0.029134631 = sum of:
            0.029134631 = weight(_text_:29 in 5602) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029134631 = score(doc=5602,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.12493842 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.035517205 = queryNorm
                0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 5602, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5602)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.33333334 = coord(3/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at changes affecting LCSH over its 100-year history. Adopting a linguistic conceptualization, it frames these changes as relating to the semantics, syntax and pragmatics of the LCSH language. While its category semantics has remained stable over time, the LCSH relational semantics underwent a significant upheaval when a thesaural structure was imposed upon its traditional See and See also structure. Over time the LCSH syntax has become increasingly complex as it has moved from being largely enumerative to in large part synthetic. Until fairly recently the LCSH pragmatics consisted of only one rule, viz, the injunction to assign specific headings. This rule, always controversial, has become even more debated and interpreted with the move to the online environment
    Series
    Cataloging and classification quarterly; vol.29, nos.1/2
    Source
    The LCSH century: one hundred years with the Library of Congress Subject Headings system. Ed.: A.T. Stone
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  4. Svenonius, E.: ¬The epistemological foundations of knowledge representations (2004) 0.01
    0.013206045 = product of:
      0.0594272 = sum of:
        0.040623292 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.040623292 = score(doc=766,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.10743652 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.37811437 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
        0.018803908 = weight(_text_:of in 766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.018803908 = score(doc=766,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.05554029 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.035517205 = queryNorm
            0.33856338 = fieldWeight in 766, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.5637573 = idf(docFreq=25162, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=766)
      0.22222222 = coord(2/9)
    
    Abstract
    This paper looks at the epistemological foundations of knowledge representations embodied in retrieval languages. It considers questions such as the validity of knowledge representations and their effectiveness for the purposes of retrieval and automation. The knowledge representations it considers are derived from three theories of meaning that have dominated twentieth-century philosophy.
    Footnote
    Artikel in einem Themenheft: The philosophy of information