-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies in the context of emerging technologies (1988)
0.02
0.023411235 = product of:
0.03511685 = sum of:
0.019100567 = weight(_text_:in in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.019100567 = score(doc=762,freq=10.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.26884392 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
10.0 = termFreq=10.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 762) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=762,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 762, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=762)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Delineates on the changing role of vocabulary control devices such as classification, subject headings, and thesaurus. Identifies the basic issue in the design and development of these devices and their role in the changing information technology. The paper identifies the differentiations needed in the new roles of these devices in data base technology
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation and information studies. 25(1988), S.215-227
-
Svenonius, E.: Unanswered questions in the design of controlled vocabularies (1986)
0.02
0.020541014 = product of:
0.03081152 = sum of:
0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014795236 = score(doc=584,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 584) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=584,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 584, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=584)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The issue of free-text versus controlled vocabulary is examined in this article. The history of the issue, which is seen as beginning with the debate over title term indexing in the last century, is reviewed and the attention is turned to questions which have not been satisfactorily addressed by previous research. The point is made that these questions need to be answered if we are to design retrieval tools, such as thesauri, upon a national basis
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 37(1986) no.5, S.331-340
-
McGarry, D.; Svenonius, E.: ¬An interview with Elaine Svenonius (2000)
0.02
0.01873103 = product of:
0.028096544 = sum of:
0.01208026 = weight(_text_:in in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.01208026 = score(doc=5356,freq=4.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.17003182 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 5356) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=5356,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 5356, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=5356)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- In an interview with Dorothy McGarry, Elaine Svenonius discusses her many-faceted career. Topics include her research interests in subject and descriptive cataloging (Svenonius notes that it "takes some untangling of vocabulary and semantics to see that the traditional bifurcation separating subject and descriptive cataloging is artificial"); her teaching experience, especially her use of Andrew Osborn's "active learning" seminar method; and her views about the development of information science and its relationship to librarianship.
-
Svenonius, E.: Good indexing : a question of evidence (1975)
0.02
0.017973388 = product of:
0.02696008 = sum of:
0.012945832 = weight(_text_:in in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012945832 = score(doc=1890,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 1890) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=1890,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 1890, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1890)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- Different types of eveidence used in answering the question: what is good indexing? are considered. The evidence is presented in the context of the method on inquiry which produced mysticism, rationalism or empiricism. The method of mysticism is illustrated with reference to Cutter and the problem of specific entry. Ranganathan's approach to the controversy over alphabetical vs. classified arrangement is used to illustrate the method of rationalism. Cleverdon's work is taken as an example of the method of empiricism. In providing evidence for good indexing, the method of empiricism is found wanting. It is suggested that the method be improved by fundamental research into problems of sampling and definition, and that it be supplementend by other methods of inquiry
- Source
- Library science with a slant to documentation. 12(1975), S.33-39
-
Svenonius, E.: ¬The impact of computer technology on knowledge representations (1992)
0.02
0.017973388 = product of:
0.02696008 = sum of:
0.012945832 = weight(_text_:in in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012945832 = score(doc=2379,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.1822149 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.014014249 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = weight(_text_:science in 2379) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.028028497 = score(doc=2379,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.20372227 = fieldWeight in 2379, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2379)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Abstract
- The advent of the computer has brought epistemological questions, heretofore the province of classificationists and philosophers, into the limelight of popular thought. No longer of only theoretical interest, such questions stand in need of operational answers, at least if computers are to process information intelligently. Answers to these questions are embodied in what today are known as knowledge representations. Knowledge representations are used for a variety of related purposes, including language and text understanding, cognitive research, expert system development and information retrieval. This paper focuses on the use of three computer-based knowledge representations of potential relevance for information retrieval: hypertext systems, cluster analysis and knowledge representations accomodating rule-based reasoning. It then considers research that might be pursued to inform the development of knowledge representations for information retrieval
- Imprint
- Bangalore : Sarada Ranganathan Endowment for Library Science
- Source
- Cognitive paradigms in knowledge organisation. 2nd Int. ISKO Conf., Madras, 26.-28.8.1992
-
Svenonius, E.; Molto, M.: Automatic derivation of name access points in cataloging (1990)
0.02
0.016372211 = product of:
0.024558317 = sum of:
0.008542033 = weight(_text_:in in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008542033 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.120230645 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 3569) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=3569,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 3569, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3569)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 41(1990) no.4, S.254-263
-
Svenonius, E.; Witthus, R.: Information science as a profession (1981)
0.02
0.015100298 = product of:
0.045300893 = sum of:
0.045300893 = product of:
0.09060179 = sum of:
0.09060179 = weight(_text_:science in 289) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.09060179 = score(doc=289,freq=4.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.6585298 = fieldWeight in 289, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=289)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Annual review of information science and technology. 16(1981), S.291-317
-
Svenonius, E.: Design of controlled vocabularies (1990)
0.01
0.0093428325 = product of:
0.028028497 = sum of:
0.028028497 = product of:
0.056056995 = sum of:
0.056056995 = weight(_text_:science in 1271) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.056056995 = score(doc=1271,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.40744454 = fieldWeight in 1271, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=1271)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Encyclopedia of library and information science. Vol.45, [=Suppl.10]
-
Svenonius, E.: Ranganathan and classification science (1992)
0.01
0.009247007 = product of:
0.027741019 = sum of:
0.027741019 = product of:
0.055482037 = sum of:
0.055482037 = weight(_text_:science in 2654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.055482037 = score(doc=2654,freq=6.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.40326554 = fieldWeight in 2654, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2654)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This article discusses some of Ranganathan's contributions to the productive, practical and theoretical aspects of classification science. These include: (1) a set of design criteria to guide the designing of schemes for knowledge / subject classification; (2) a conceptual framework for organizing the universe of subjects; and (3) an understanding of the general principles underlying subject disciplines and classificatory languages. It concludes that Ranganathan has contributed significantly to laying the foundations for a science of subject classification.
-
Svenonius, E.: Use of classification in online retrieval (1983)
0.01
0.0056946888 = product of:
0.017084066 = sum of:
0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 108) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017084066 = score(doc=108,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 108, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=108)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Svenonius, E.: Bibliographic control (1990)
0.01
0.0056946888 = product of:
0.017084066 = sum of:
0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 461) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017084066 = score(doc=461,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 461, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=461)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Series
- ACRL publications in librarianship; No.47
-
Svenonius, E.; Schmierer, H.P.: Current issues in the subject control of information (1977)
0.01
0.0056946888 = product of:
0.017084066 = sum of:
0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 5278) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017084066 = score(doc=5278,freq=2.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 5278, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5278)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
-
Svenonius, E.: Precoordination or not? (1995)
0.01
0.0056946888 = product of:
0.017084066 = sum of:
0.017084066 = weight(_text_:in in 3606) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.017084066 = score(doc=3606,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.24046129 = fieldWeight in 3606, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3606)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Content
- Vgl. auch: Sauperl, A.: Precoordination or not?: a new view of the old question. In: Journal of documentation. 65(2009) no.5, S.817-833.
- Footnote
- Vgl. auch die deutsche Übersetzung in: ZfBB (1994) H.3, S.294-297
- Source
- Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings of the IFLA Satellite Meeting Held in Lisbon, Portugal, 17-18 August 1993, and sponsored by the IFLA Section on Classification and Indexing and the Instituto da Biblioteca Nacional e do Livro, Lisbon, Portugal. Ed.: R.P. Holley et al
-
Svenonius, E.: Facets as semantic categories (1979)
0.01
0.0056500244 = product of:
0.016950073 = sum of:
0.016950073 = weight(_text_:in in 1427) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016950073 = score(doc=1427,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1427, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1427)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- The paper looks at the semantic and syntactic components of facet definition. In synthetic classificatory languages, primitive terms are categorized into facets; facet information, when, is used in stating the syntactic rules for combining primitive terms into the acceptable (well-formed) complex expressions in the language. In other words, the structure of a synthetic classificatory language can be defined in terms of the facets recognized in the language and the syntactic rules employed by the language. Thus, facets are the "grammatical categories" of classificatory languages and their definition is the first step in formulating structural descriptions of such languages. As well, the study of how facets are defined can give some insight into how language is used to embody information
-
Svenonius, E.: Präkoordination - ja oder nein? (1994)
0.01
0.0056500244 = product of:
0.016950073 = sum of:
0.016950073 = weight(_text_:in in 1643) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.016950073 = score(doc=1643,freq=14.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23857531 = fieldWeight in 1643, product of:
3.7416575 = tf(freq=14.0), with freq of:
14.0 = termFreq=14.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1643)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Die Diskussion um Vor- und Nachteile von Präkoordination oder Postkoordination wird unter den in der verbalen Sacherschließung Engagierten in Deutschland seit Jahren geführt. Mit zunehmender Verbreitung der RSWK gewinnen die Überlegungen, die sich angesichts der Ausbreitung des OPAC für das 'Zerschlagen' der Schlagwortketten aussprechen, an Bedeutung. In diesem Zusammenhang trägt eine Berücksichtigung der internationalen Debatte um Prä- und Postkoordination zur Erweiterung des nationalen Horizontes bei. Der Beitrag ist eine leicht gekürzte Übersetzung eines Referates, das die Autorin beim IFLA Satellite Meeting zum Thema 'Subject indexing in the 90's - principles and practices' im August 1993 in Lissabon gehalten hat
- Footnote
- Original in: Subject indexing: principles and practices in the 90's. Proceedings ... Ed.: R.P. Holley et al. München: Saur 1995, S.231-255. - Übersetzt und mit einem Nachwort (S.294-296) versehen von M. Heiner-Freiling
-
Svenonius, E.: Access to nonbook materials : the limits of subject indexing for visual and aural languages (1994)
0.01
0.0053387615 = product of:
0.016016284 = sum of:
0.016016284 = product of:
0.032032568 = sum of:
0.032032568 = weight(_text_:science in 8263) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032032568 = score(doc=8263,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1375819 = queryWeight, product of:
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.23282544 = fieldWeight in 8263, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.6341193 = idf(docFreq=8627, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=8263)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 45(1994) no.8, S.600-606
-
Svenonius, E.; McGarry, D.: Objectivity in evaluating subject heading assignment (1993)
0.00
0.0049828524 = product of:
0.014948557 = sum of:
0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 5612) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014948557 = score(doc=5612,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 5612, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5612)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Recent papers have called attention to discrepancies in the assignment of LCSH. While philosophical arguments can be made that subject analysis, if not a logical impossibility, at least is point-of-view dependent, subject headings continue to be assigned and continue to be useful. The hypothesis advanced in the present project is that to a considerable degree there is a clear-cut right and wrong to LCSH subject heading assignment. To test the hypothesis, it was postulated that the assignment of a subject heading is correct if it is supported by textual warrant (at least 20% of the book being cataloged is on the topic) and is constructed in accordance with the LoC Subject Cataloging Manual: Subject Headings. A sample of 100 books on scientific subjects was used to test the hypothesis
-
Svenonius, E.: Facet definition: a case study (1978)
0.00
0.0049828524 = product of:
0.014948557 = sum of:
0.014948557 = weight(_text_:in in 2623) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014948557 = score(doc=2623,freq=8.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.21040362 = fieldWeight in 2623, product of:
2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
8.0 = termFreq=8.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2623)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Historical account of the sophisticated method of indexing developed by J.O. Kaiser (1896/97), a librarian at the Philadelphia Commercial Museum who established his index on cards (a novelty then) and distinguished his items according to the categories 'concrete', 'process', and 'country'. He also introduced "statement indexing" and rules to this end in order to permit the supply of "complete information" on a subject in a document. In summarizing these findings, the author stresses the necessitiy of establishing well-defined categories if an organization of terms is to serve e.g. information retrieval.
- Footnote
- Wiederabdruck in: Knowledge organization 43(2016) no.6, S.462-473.
-
Svenonius, E.: Directions for research in indexing, classification, and cataloging (1981)
0.00
0.0049317456 = product of:
0.014795236 = sum of:
0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 1891) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014795236 = score(doc=1891,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 1891, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1891)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- This paper speculates on directions for research in the field of bibliographical control, where bibliographical control is taken to include indexing, classification, and cataloging. The approach taken is to consider questions in the field that need answering. The position taken is that while concerns of a how-to-do-it nature drive this field's research, which is of an evaluative or developmental nature, there is a strong need for this research to be backed by basic theoretical research
-
Svenonius, E.: Classification: prospects, problems, and possibilities (1992)
0.00
0.0049317456 = product of:
0.014795236 = sum of:
0.014795236 = weight(_text_:in in 2084) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.014795236 = score(doc=2084,freq=6.0), product of:
0.07104705 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.052230705 = queryNorm
0.2082456 = fieldWeight in 2084, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=2084)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
- Abstract
- Classification research at any point in time is the resultant product of various philosophical, technological, social, economic, and political forces. This address attemps first to give a partial description of the present state of classification research as determined by one of these forces: philosophy, in particular the 20th century analytic philosophies of logical positivism, linguistic analysis and systems analysis; and, second, assuming the continued influence of these, to speculate upon the future of classification research in terms of its prospects, problems and possibilities
