Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.: Which layout do you prefer? : an analysis of readers' preferences for different typographic layouts of structured abstracts (1996) 0.09

0.08868446 = product of:
  0.13302669 = sum of:
    0.12147172 = weight(_text_:400 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.12147172 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.2795319 = queryWeight, product of:
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04264262 = queryNorm
        0.43455404 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          6.5552235 = idf(docFreq=170, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
    0.011554973 = product of:
      0.034664918 = sum of:
        0.034664918 = weight(_text_:22 in 4411) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.034664918 = score(doc=4411,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04264262 = queryNorm
            0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4411, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4411)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.6666667 = coord(2/3)

Abstract: Structured abstracts are abstracts which include subheadings such as: background, aims, participants methods and results. These are rapidly replacing traditional abstracts in medical periodicals, but the number and detail of the subheadings used varies, and there is a range of different typographic settings. Reviews a number of studies designed to investigate readers' preferences for different typographic settings and layout. Over 400 readers took part in the study: students; postgraduates; research workers and academics in the social sciences. The most preferred version emerged from the last of 3 studies and 2 additional studies were then carried out to determine preferences for the overall position and layout of this most preferred version on a A4 page. The most preferred version for the setting of the subheadings are printed in bold capital letters
Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.1, S.27-37

Hartley, J.; Sydes, M.; Blurton, A.: Obtaining information accurately and quickly : are structured abstracts more efficient? (1996) 0.00

0.0032097148 = product of:
  0.009629144 = sum of:
    0.009629144 = product of:
      0.028887432 = sum of:
        0.028887432 = weight(_text_:22 in 7673) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.028887432 = score(doc=7673,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.14932719 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04264262 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 7673, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=7673)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Source: Journal of information science. 22(1996) no.5, S.349-356

Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors