Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
themes%3a%22Preserved context index system %28PRECIS%29%22 2

Szostak, R.: ¬A grammatical approach to subject classification in museums (2017) 0.01
```
0.006523886 = product of:
  0.03261943 = sum of:
    0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 4136) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03261943 = score(doc=4136,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 4136, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=4136)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Several desiderata of a system of subject classification for museums are identified. The limitations of existing approaches are reviewed. It is argued that an approach which synthesizes basic concepts within a grammatical structure can achieve the goals of subject classification in museums while addressing diverse challenges. The same approach can also be applied in galleries, archives, and libraries. The approach is described in some detail and examples are provided of its application. The article closes with brief discussions of thesauri and linked open data.
Szostak, R.: ¬A pluralistic approach to the philosophy of classification : a case for "public knowledge" (2015) 0.01
```
0.006523886 = product of:
  0.03261943 = sum of:
    0.03261943 = weight(_text_:system in 5541) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.03261943 = score(doc=5541,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.13391352 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04251826 = queryNorm
        0.2435858 = fieldWeight in 5541, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.1495528 = idf(docFreq=5152, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5541)
  0.2 = coord(1/5)
```
Abstract

Any classification system should be evaluated with respect to a variety of philosophical and practical concerns. This paper explores several distinct issues: the nature of a work, the value of a statement, the contribution of information science to philosophy, the nature of hierarchy, ethical evaluation, pre- versus postcoordination, the lived experience of librarians, and formalization versus natural language. It evaluates a particular approach to classification in terms of each of these but draws general lessons for philosophical evaluation. That approach to classification emphasizes the free combination of basic concepts representing both real things in the world and the relationships among these; works are also classified in terms of theories, methods, and perspectives applied.