Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tait, J."
  1. Robertson, S.; Tait, J.: In Memoriam Karen Sparck Jones (2007) 0.02
    0.018531853 = product of:
      0.037063707 = sum of:
        0.037063707 = product of:
          0.07412741 = sum of:
            0.07412741 = weight(_text_:22 in 2927) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.07412741 = score(doc=2927,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15966053 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 2927, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=2927)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    26.12.2007 14:22:47
  2. Salampasis, M.; Tait, J.; Bloor, C.: Evaluation of information-seeking performance in hypermedia digital libraries (1998) 0.01
    0.013661061 = product of:
      0.027322123 = sum of:
        0.027322123 = product of:
          0.054644246 = sum of:
            0.054644246 = weight(_text_:r in 3759) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.054644246 = score(doc=3759,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.3620595 = fieldWeight in 3759, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3759)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Discusses current information retrieval methods based on recall (R) and precision (P) for evaluating information retrieval and examines their suitability for evaluating the performance of hypermedia digital libraries. Proposes a new quantitative evaluation methodology, based on the structural analysis of hypermedia networks and the navigational and search state patterns of information seekers. Although the proposed methodology retains some of the characteristics of R and P evaluation, it could be more suitable than them for measuring the performance of information-seeking environments where information seekers can utilize arbitrary mixtures of browsing and query-based searching strategies
  3. Tait, J.: CALS and its implications for the library and information retrieval communities (1994) 0.01
    0.00965983 = product of:
      0.01931966 = sum of:
        0.01931966 = product of:
          0.03863932 = sum of:
            0.03863932 = weight(_text_:r in 1661) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03863932 = score(doc=1661,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15092614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045593463 = queryNorm
                0.25601473 = fieldWeight in 1661, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.3102584 = idf(docFreq=4387, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1661)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Information retrieval: new systems and current research. Proceedings of the 15th Research Colloquium of the British Computer Society Information Retrieval Specialist Group, Glasgow, 1993. Ed.: R. Leon