-
Taniguchi, S.: User tasks in the RDA-based model (2013)
0.00
0.0014588641 = product of:
0.033553872 = sum of:
0.033553872 = sum of:
0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010999122 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 1956) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255475 = score(doc=1956,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1956, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1956)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- I examine user tasks and their related issues in the model that reflects Resource Description and Access (RDA) directly, which complements prior studies that dealt mainly with entities and their attributes and relationships. First, the definitions of user tasks in Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR), Functional Requirements for Authority Data (FRAD), and RDA, respectively, are reviewed. Then, mappings between attributes and relationships of the RDA entities to the user tasks are proposed for the RDA-based model; the mapping covering Group 1 and 2 entities, and that for the other entities. The resultant RDA mappings and those shown in FRBR and FRAD are compared, which reveals the superiority of the former mappings.
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:14:26
-
Taniguchi, S.: Understanding RDA as a DC application profile (2013)
0.00
5.603665E-4 = product of:
0.012888429 = sum of:
0.012888429 = product of:
0.025776858 = sum of:
0.025776858 = weight(_text_:29 in 1906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025776858 = score(doc=1906,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.31092256 = fieldWeight in 1906, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1906)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:05:09
-
Taniguchi, S.: Mapping and merging of IFLA Library Reference Model and BIBFRAME 2.0 (2018)
0.00
5.561361E-4 = product of:
0.012791129 = sum of:
0.012791129 = weight(_text_:und in 5162) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012791129 = score(doc=5162,freq=2.0), product of:
0.052235067 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.24487628 = fieldWeight in 5162, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=5162)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Abstract
- Zusammenfassung von FRBR, FRAD und FRSAD in einem Modell (vgl. das Modell selbst).
-
Taniguchi, S.: Viewing RDA from FRBR and FRAD : does RDA represent a different conceptual model? (2012)
0.00
4.903207E-4 = product of:
0.011277375 = sum of:
0.011277375 = product of:
0.02255475 = sum of:
0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 1936) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255475 = score(doc=1936,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1936, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1936)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 11:12:56
-
Taniguchi, S.: Aggregate and component entities in RDA : model and description (2013)
0.00
4.903207E-4 = product of:
0.011277375 = sum of:
0.011277375 = product of:
0.02255475 = sum of:
0.02255475 = weight(_text_:29 in 1951) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02255475 = score(doc=1951,freq=2.0), product of:
0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 1951, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1951)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Date
- 29. 5.2015 19:02:49
-
Taniguchi, S.: Modeling resource description tasks in RDA (2015)
0.00
2.3911135E-4 = product of:
0.005499561 = sum of:
0.005499561 = product of:
0.010999122 = sum of:
0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 2013) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010999122 = score(doc=2013,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 2013, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2013)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.1, S.88-111
-
Taniguchi, S.: Is BIBFRAME 2.0 a suitable schema for exchanging and sharing diverse descriptive metadata about bibliographic resources? (2018)
0.00
2.3911135E-4 = product of:
0.005499561 = sum of:
0.005499561 = product of:
0.010999122 = sum of:
0.010999122 = weight(_text_:1 in 5165) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.010999122 = score(doc=5165,freq=2.0), product of:
0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.023567878 = queryNorm
0.18998542 = fieldWeight in 5165, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5165)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
- Source
- Cataloging and classification quarterly. 56(2018) no.1, S.40-61
