Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

Did you mean:
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeinen %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f firmen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesign %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesign %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2
rvk_ss%3a%2200 15860 allgemeines %2f medien- und kommunikationswissenschaften%2c kommunikationsdesigns %2f formen der kommunikation und des kommunikationsdesigns %2f kommunikationsdesign in elektronischen medien%22 2

Taniguchi, S.: ¬An analysis of the oriented-ness in cataloguing rules (1997) 0.00

5.097578E-4 = product of:
  0.010195156 = sum of:
    0.010195156 = weight(_text_:in in 6343) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.010195156 = score(doc=6343,freq=6.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.260307 = fieldWeight in 6343, product of:
          2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
            6.0 = termFreq=6.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=6343)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)

Abstract: Proposes an approach to the analysis of cataloguing rules seen as bibliographic description in terms of 'oriented-ness'. Assesses the validity and usefulness of the proposed approach and considers its problems and issues
Footnote: [In Japanisch]

Taniguchi, S.: Reevaluation of the 3-layered model in descriptive cataloguing (1997) 0.00
```
4.606661E-4 = product of:
  0.009213322 = sum of:
    0.009213322 = weight(_text_:in in 91) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.009213322 = score(doc=91,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.039165888 = queryWeight, product of:
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.02879306 = queryNorm
        0.23523843 = fieldWeight in 91, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=91)
  0.05 = coord(1/20)
```
Abstract

Several years ago a conceptual framework was proposed that was designed to capture a bibliographic item by means of a structured approach and to present it in a structured manner in a bibliographic record: the 3-layered approach. Recently IFLA published the report of a study entitled 'Functional requirements for bibliographic records: draft report for worldwide review' for the purpose of a thorough reexamination of the question based on an analysis of user needs. The IFLA report attempted to capture the bibliographic universe through E-R analysis and to define entities, attributes of entities and relationships between them, all of which constitute the bibliographic universe. Compares the 3-layered model and the IFLA model culminating in a reevaluation of the 3-layered model

Footnote

[In Japanisch]