Search (11 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Taylor, A.G."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Taylor, A.G.: Enhancing subject access in online systems : the year's work in subject analysis, 1991 (1992) 0.00
    0.0045768693 = product of:
      0.032038085 = sum of:
        0.008071727 = weight(_text_:information in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008071727 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.1551638 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
        0.023966359 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.023966359 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.26736724 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.14285715 = coord(2/14)
    
    Abstract
    The research literature published in 1991 in the following categories is examined: users and subject searching, subject access in online catalogs, subject cataloging and indexing, information retrieval, thesaurus and indexing approaches, classification, and specialized subjects and materials. The preponderance of the research dealt with improving subject access in online systems. This seems to have been the result of acceptance by many researchers of a number of previously researched hypotheses that, taken together, indicate that improving online systems holds more promise than trying to perfect the processes of subject analysis
  2. Taylor, A.G.: ¬An introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2007) 0.00
    0.0025678244 = product of:
      0.03594954 = sum of:
        0.03594954 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.03594954 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.40105087 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Understanding FRBR: what it is and how it will affect our retrieval tools. Ed. by Arlene Taylor
  3. Taylor, A.G.: On the subject of subjects (1995) 0.00
    0.0015294895 = product of:
      0.021412853 = sum of:
        0.021412853 = product of:
          0.064238556 = sum of:
            0.064238556 = weight(_text_:22 in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.064238556 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    11. 1.1997 19:22:24
  4. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.00
    0.0014978976 = product of:
      0.020970564 = sum of:
        0.020970564 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.020970564 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08963835 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.23394634 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Theme
    Verbale Doksprachen im Online-Retrieval
  5. Taylor, A.G.: ¬The information universe : will we have chaos of control? (1994) 0.00
    0.0012892094 = product of:
      0.01804893 = sum of:
        0.01804893 = weight(_text_:information in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.01804893 = score(doc=1644,freq=10.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.3469568 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
              3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
                10.0 = termFreq=10.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    Presents evidence to suggest that the online world needs the bibliographic skills of librarians but that the term bibliographic control is likely to be associated specifically with libraries and liable to misinterpretation. Suggests that it may be time to start talking about information organization which may be described as having the following 4 aspects: making new information bearing entities known; acquiring such entities at certain points of accumulation; providing name, title and subject access to the entities; and providing for the physical location of copies. Urges librarians rapidly to adapt their skills to this increasing need for information organization
    Theme
    Information
  6. Taylor, A.G.: Where does AACR2 fall short for Internet resources? (1999) 0.00
    9.986174E-4 = product of:
      0.013980643 = sum of:
        0.013980643 = weight(_text_:information in 6102) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.013980643 = score(doc=6102,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.2687516 = fieldWeight in 6102, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=6102)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    While the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules, Second Edition (AACR2) has served well for all kinds of new information packages as they have been developed since the inception of AACR2 in 1978, the Internet is presenting challenges that are not as readily soluble. Five of the major problems for catalogers are discussed: What is an information package? What is a chief source of information? What is a new edition? Are all Internet resources "published"? Why a "Rule of 3"? Some issues and problems are discussed and some recommendations are made
  7. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.00
    6.6915166E-4 = product of:
      0.009368123 = sum of:
        0.009368123 = product of:
          0.028104367 = sum of:
            0.028104367 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028104367 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.103770934 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.029633347 = queryNorm
                0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  8. Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: On teaching subject cataloging (2002) 0.00
    6.241359E-4 = product of:
      0.008737902 = sum of:
        0.008737902 = weight(_text_:information in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008737902 = score(doc=5458,freq=6.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.16796975 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                6.0 = termFreq=6.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The authors, Professor Arlene G. Taylor and her doctoral student, Daniel N. Joudrey, discuss their approach to teaching subject cataloging in the graduate library and information sciences (LIS) program at the University of Pittsburgh's School of Information Sciences. This essay discusses the authors' thoughts on the importance of subject cataloging in graduate LIS education, the theory versus practice debate, goals, class work, grading, making it concrete to the students, ordering topics in the courses, separating subject analysis from descriptive cataloging, and concerns for the future. In the not too distant past, library schools considered the teaching of Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Subject Headings to be totally adequate preparation for graduates to function subject-wise in their chosen profession. As time has moved on we have gone through periods in which even these were considered unnecessary "because keyword searching is better than subject headings" and "classification is only a location device." The complexities of the current world of subject access (or lack thereof), however, demand that a more complex and thorough approach be taken.
    Footnote
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes: Education for cataloging and the organization of information: pitfalls and the pendulum; Part I
  9. Taylor, A.G.: Teaching authority control (2004) 0.00
    5.04483E-4 = product of:
      0.0070627616 = sum of:
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 5663) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=5663,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5663, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5663)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The teaching of authority control in schools of library and information science has been given little attention until recently. A 2002 article reported that only a little over a third of respondents to a questionnaire believed they had learned about authority control in school. This paper reports a survey of teachers to determine how much authority control is taught in school. Respondents all emphasized the importance of trying to teach authority control to all students of library science and enthusiastically shared their methodologies, while admitting that it is a difficult concept to get across to students. Teachers also face non-understanding from colleagues, lack of course time, and competition from technology courses.
  10. Taylor, A.G.: Teaching the Dewey Decimal Classification System (2006) 0.00
    5.04483E-4 = product of:
      0.0070627616 = sum of:
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 5763) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=5763,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 5763, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5763)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Abstract
    The Dewey Decimal Classification (DDC) system is a logical approach to a hierarchical categorization of recorded knowledge that makes sense to many people. It both illustrates classification theory and provides a practical way to organize information. It is taught in several different settings with content relying upon the purpose of the education or training. With reference to communications from colleagues, the author identifies some problems in teaching DDC, followed by some of the content covered and some methodologies used to overcome the problems. Several examples of teaching tools are included as appendices.
  11. Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Cataloging (2009) 0.00
    5.04483E-4 = product of:
      0.0070627616 = sum of:
        0.0070627616 = weight(_text_:information in 3758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0070627616 = score(doc=3758,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.052020688 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.029633347 = queryNorm
            0.13576832 = fieldWeight in 3758, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3758)
      0.071428575 = coord(1/14)
    
    Source
    Encyclopedia of library and information sciences. 3rd ed. Ed.: M.J. Bates