Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Taylor, A.G."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.06
    0.058442302 = product of:
      0.116884604 = sum of:
        0.116884604 = sum of:
          0.065317005 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.065317005 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.2142908 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05437307 = queryNorm
              0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
          0.051567603 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.051567603 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.19040523 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.05437307 = queryNorm
              0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    As we move toward implementing RDA: Resource Description and Access, I have been pondering how we might manage the transition to new cataloging rules effectively. I was a practicing cataloger when Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules, 2nd ed., was implemented and remember it as a traumatic process. The published literature that I found focused on the impact of the then-new rules on specific formats and genres, but no one seems to have addressed the process of implementation and what type of training worked well (or did not). After a bit of sleuthing, I found a pertinent presentation by Arlene G. Taylor, which she graciously agreed to repurpose as this guest editorial.
    Date
    10. 9.2000 17:38:22
  2. Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.02
    0.016329251 = product of:
      0.032658502 = sum of:
        0.032658502 = product of:
          0.065317005 = sum of:
            0.065317005 = weight(_text_:cataloging in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.065317005 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.2142908 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.05437307 = queryNorm
                0.30480546 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.9411201 = idf(docFreq=2334, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Cataloging and classification quarterly. 53(2015) no.1, S.1-39