Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

Taylor, A.G.: Variations in personal name access points in OCLC bibliographic records (1992) 0.05

0.04526302 = product of:
  0.13578905 = sum of:
    0.13578905 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 5398) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.13578905 = score(doc=5398,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.68819946 = fieldWeight in 5398, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5398)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Taylor, A.G.: ¬An introduction to Functional Requirements for Bibliographic Records (FRBR) (2007) 0.03

0.033947267 = product of:
  0.10184179 = sum of:
    0.10184179 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1679) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.10184179 = score(doc=1679,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.5161496 = fieldWeight in 1679, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1679)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Taylor, A.G.: ¬The information universe : will we have chaos of control? (1994) 0.03
```
0.032005787 = product of:
  0.09601736 = sum of:
    0.09601736 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 1644) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.09601736 = score(doc=1644,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.4866305 = fieldWeight in 1644, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1644)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Presents evidence to suggest that the online world needs the bibliographic skills of librarians but that the term bibliographic control is likely to be associated specifically with libraries and liable to misinterpretation. Suggests that it may be time to start talking about information organization which may be described as having the following 4 aspects: making new information bearing entities known; acquiring such entities at certain points of accumulation; providing name, title and subject access to the entities; and providing for the physical location of copies. Urges librarians rapidly to adapt their skills to this increasing need for information organization

Taylor, A.G.: ¬The organization of information (2003) 0.03

0.028289389 = product of:
  0.08486816 = sum of:
    0.08486816 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 4596) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.08486816 = score(doc=4596,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.43012467 = fieldWeight in 4596, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4596)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Abstract: Provides a detailed and insightful discussion of such basic retrieval tools as bibliographies, catalogues, indexes, finding aids, registers, databases, major bibliographic utilities, and other organizing entities.

Wynar, B.S.; Taylor, A.G.: Introduction to cataloging and classification (1985) 0.02
```
0.020003617 = product of:
  0.06001085 = sum of:
    0.06001085 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 2576) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.06001085 = score(doc=2576,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.30414405 = fieldWeight in 2576, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2576)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

After 25 years of service, this professional text has been updated in line with developments in the field of library science. Since the seventh edition of this standard text was published in 1985, there have been changes in virtually every area of bibliographic control. "AACR2 Revised" (AACR2R) has been implemented; new editions of or supplements to LCSH, LC classification, and DDC, and "Sears" have appeared; OCLC has adopted the PRISM format; and networking and online catalogues have become a way of life. Taylor addresses these and other changes in this edition. Consequently, many chapters of this text are entirely new, such as "Cataloguing in Context" and "Subject Arrangement of Library Materials", or fully revised such as "Development of Cataloguing Codes", which has been expanded to show the continuity in the development leading to publication of AACR2R. Two appendices have been added: an introduction to USMARC format and instructions for typing catalogue cards, including a detailed analysis of the punctuation and spacing to be used when conforming to the International Standard Bibliographic Description (ISBD).
Taylor, A.G.: Authority files in online catalogs : an investigation of their value (1984) 0.02
```
0.01980257 = product of:
  0.05940771 = sum of:
    0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 326) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05940771 = score(doc=326,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 326, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=326)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Authority control is discussed from two viewpoints: The need for bibliographic records relating to a name to be brought together under one form of the name; and the need for cross references to direct a user to a heading from variant forms of the name. Data from two research projects that support the need for choosing one form of name are summarized. The author's study of user requests that resulted in no "hits" in an online catalog is described. Data are given to show that for only 6.4% of these requests would our current methods of cross referencing in authority records have been helpful, and that two system programs would have given much greater assistance.
Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Cataloging (2009) 0.02
```
0.01980257 = product of:
  0.05940771 = sum of:
    0.05940771 = weight(_text_:bibliographic in 3758) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.05940771 = score(doc=3758,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.19731061 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.05068286 = queryNorm
        0.30108726 = fieldWeight in 3758, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.893044 = idf(docFreq=2449, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=3758)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

Bibliographic control, the larger field of which cataloging is a part, is discussed in order to provide the context for cataloging. A major product of the process of cataloging, the catalog, is explained in order to underscore why cataloging is needed. The processes for completing original cataloging are delineated, followed by a brief look at cooperative and copy cataloging. Methods for encoding metadata records for online storage and display are outlined. A look at new initiatives and trends for the future of cataloging conclude the discussion.

Taylor, A.G.: On the subject of subjects (1995) 0.02

0.018311542 = product of:
  0.05493462 = sum of:
    0.05493462 = product of:
      0.10986924 = sum of:
        0.10986924 = weight(_text_:22 in 6087) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.10986924 = score(doc=6087,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.61904186 = fieldWeight in 6087, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=6087)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 11. 1.1997 19:22:24

Taylor, A.G.: Enhancing subject access in online systems : the year's work in subject analysis, 1991 (1992) 0.01
```
0.012218123 = product of:
  0.036654368 = sum of:
    0.036654368 = product of:
      0.073308736 = sum of:
        0.073308736 = weight(_text_:searching in 1504) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.073308736 = score(doc=1504,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.3575566 = fieldWeight in 1504, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1504)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The research literature published in 1991 in the following categories is examined: users and subject searching, subject access in online catalogs, subject cataloging and indexing, information retrieval, thesaurus and indexing approaches, classification, and specialized subjects and materials. The preponderance of the research dealt with improving subject access in online systems. This seems to have been the result of acceptance by many researchers of a number of previously researched hypotheses that, taken together, indicate that improving online systems holds more promise than trying to perfect the processes of subject analysis

Gross, T.; Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: Still a lot to lose : the role of controlled vocabulary in keyword searching (2015) 0.01

0.010690859 = product of:
  0.032072574 = sum of:
    0.032072574 = product of:
      0.06414515 = sum of:
        0.06414515 = weight(_text_:searching in 2007) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.06414515 = score(doc=2007,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.31286204 = fieldWeight in 2007, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2007)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Taylor, A.G.: Implementing AACR and AACR2 : a personal perspective and lessons learned (2012) 0.01

0.008011299 = product of:
  0.024033897 = sum of:
    0.024033897 = product of:
      0.048067793 = sum of:
        0.048067793 = weight(_text_:22 in 2546) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048067793 = score(doc=2546,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.17748274 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.2708308 = fieldWeight in 2546, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2546)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)

Date: 10. 9.2000 17:38:22

Taylor, A.G.; Joudrey, D.N.: On teaching subject cataloging (2002) 0.01
```
0.007636327 = product of:
  0.02290898 = sum of:
    0.02290898 = product of:
      0.04581796 = sum of:
        0.04581796 = weight(_text_:searching in 5458) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.04581796 = score(doc=5458,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.20502694 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.05068286 = queryNorm
            0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 5458, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5458)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
```
Abstract

The authors, Professor Arlene G. Taylor and her doctoral student, Daniel N. Joudrey, discuss their approach to teaching subject cataloging in the graduate library and information sciences (LIS) program at the University of Pittsburgh's School of Information Sciences. This essay discusses the authors' thoughts on the importance of subject cataloging in graduate LIS education, the theory versus practice debate, goals, class work, grading, making it concrete to the students, ordering topics in the courses, separating subject analysis from descriptive cataloging, and concerns for the future. In the not too distant past, library schools considered the teaching of Dewey Decimal Classification and Library of Congress Subject Headings to be totally adequate preparation for graduates to function subject-wise in their chosen profession. As time has moved on we have gone through periods in which even these were considered unnecessary "because keyword searching is better than subject headings" and "classification is only a location device." The complexities of the current world of subject access (or lack thereof), however, demand that a more complex and thorough approach be taken.

Search (12 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors

Years

Types

Themes

Subjects

Classifications