Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tenopir, C."
  • × theme_ss:"Benutzerstudien"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Tenopir, C.; Green, D.: Patterns of use and usage factors for online databases in academic and public libraries (1999) 0.00
    0.002654651 = product of:
      0.007963953 = sum of:
        0.007963953 = weight(_text_:a in 6700) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.007963953 = score(doc=6700,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.15287387 = fieldWeight in 6700, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=6700)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Abstract
    Database usage data from a random sample of academic and public libraries in the U.S. and Canada reveals patterns of use in selected types of libraries. Library users in both public and academic libraries tend to use commercial online databases most frequently early in the week, mid-day, and at times that correspond to the academic calendar (November in this six-month sample.) The mean number of simultaneous users is correlated with the size of the population served and the number of workstations available, but relatively low numbers of users are simultaneously logged on to research databases at all sizes of libraries. A questionnaire sent to these same libraries identified many other factors that might influence database use, including levels of instruction, availability of remote login, placement of a database on the library's homepage, although none of these factors was found to be statistically significant
    Type
    a
  2. Nahl, D.; Tenopir, C.: Affective and cognitive searching behavior of novice end-users of a full-text database (1996) 0.00
    0.002212209 = product of:
      0.0066366266 = sum of:
        0.0066366266 = weight(_text_:a in 4213) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0066366266 = score(doc=4213,freq=8.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.12739488 = fieldWeight in 4213, product of:
              2.828427 = tf(freq=8.0), with freq of:
                8.0 = termFreq=8.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4213)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Footnote
    Novice end users were given 2 hours of training in searching a full-text magazine database (Magazine ASAP(TM)) on DIALOG. Subjects searched during 3 to 4 sessions in the presence of a trained monitor who prompted them to think aloud throughout the sessions. qualitative analysis of the transcripts and transaction logs yielded empirical information on user variables (purpose, motivation, satisfaction), uses of the database, move types, and every question users asked during the searches. The spontaneous, naturalistic questions were categorized according to affective, cognitive, and sensorimotor speech acts. Results show that most of the searches were performed for the self and were work related. The most common use of the database was to retrieve full-text articles online and to download and print them out rather than read them on screen. The majority of searches were judged satisfactory. Innovative uses included browsing for background information and obtaining contextualized sentences for language teaching. Searchers made twice as many moves to limit sets as moves to expand sets. Affective questions outnumbered cognitive and sensorimotor questions by two to one. This preponderance of affective micro-information needs during searching might be addressed by new system functions
    Type
    a
  3. Tenopir, C.; Nahl-Jakobovits, D.; Howard, D.L.: Strategies and assessments online : novices' experience (1991) 0.00
    0.0017697671 = product of:
      0.0053093014 = sum of:
        0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 1919) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053093014 = score(doc=1919,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 1919, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=1919)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a
  4. Tenopir, C.: Common end user errors (1997) 0.00
    0.0017697671 = product of:
      0.0053093014 = sum of:
        0.0053093014 = weight(_text_:a in 410) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0053093014 = score(doc=410,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.05209492 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.045180224 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 410, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=410)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
    
    Type
    a