Search (9 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for assessing the teaching impact of books from online academic syllabi (2016) 0.01
    0.012328308 = product of:
      0.024656616 = sum of:
        0.024656616 = product of:
          0.049313232 = sum of:
            0.049313232 = weight(_text_:56 in 3226) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.049313232 = score(doc=3226,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.21469334 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.22969149 = fieldWeight in 3226, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.1578603 = idf(docFreq=1879, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3226)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    Scholars writing books that are widely used to support teaching in higher education may be undervalued because of a lack of evidence of teaching value. Although sales data may give credible evidence for textbooks, these data may poorly reflect educational uses of other types of books. As an alternative, this article proposes a method to search automatically for mentions of books in online academic course syllabi based on Bing searches for syllabi mentioning a given book, filtering out false matches through an extensive set of rules. The method had an accuracy of over 90% based on manual checks of a sample of 2,600 results from the initial Bing searches. Over one third of about 14,000 monographs checked had one or more academic syllabus mention, with more in the arts and humanities (56%) and social sciences (52%). Low but significant correlations between syllabus mentions and citations across most fields, except the social sciences, suggest that books tend to have different levels of impact for teaching and research. In conclusion, the automatic syllabus search method gives a new way to estimate the educational utility of books in a way that sales data and citation counts cannot.
  2. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011) 0.01
    0.010493852 = product of:
      0.020987704 = sum of:
        0.020987704 = product of:
          0.04197541 = sum of:
            0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04197541 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:27:06
  3. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016) 0.01
    0.010493852 = product of:
      0.020987704 = sum of:
        0.020987704 = product of:
          0.04197541 = sum of:
            0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04197541 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2016 12:22:00
  4. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 0.01
    0.010493852 = product of:
      0.020987704 = sum of:
        0.020987704 = product of:
          0.04197541 = sum of:
            0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04197541 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2016 11:07:22
  5. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018) 0.01
    0.010493852 = product of:
      0.020987704 = sum of:
        0.020987704 = product of:
          0.04197541 = sum of:
            0.04197541 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.04197541 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2018 10:00:22
  6. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.01
    0.008744878 = product of:
      0.017489756 = sum of:
        0.017489756 = product of:
          0.03497951 = sum of:
            0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497951 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  7. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.01
    0.008744878 = product of:
      0.017489756 = sum of:
        0.017489756 = product of:
          0.03497951 = sum of:
            0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497951 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
  8. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01
    0.008744878 = product of:
      0.017489756 = sum of:
        0.017489756 = product of:
          0.03497951 = sum of:
            0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497951 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  9. Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017) 0.01
    0.008744878 = product of:
      0.017489756 = sum of:
        0.017489756 = product of:
          0.03497951 = sum of:
            0.03497951 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.03497951 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.18081884 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.051635534 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22