-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.02
0.023792876 = product of:
0.059482187 = sum of:
0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02432114 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.035161044 = product of:
0.052741565 = sum of:
0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02648993 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose Public attitudes towards COVID-19 and social distancing are critical in reducing its spread. It is therefore important to understand public reactions and information dissemination in all major forms, including on social media. This article investigates important issues reflected on Twitter in the early stages of the public reaction to COVID-19. Design/methodology/approach A thematic analysis of the most retweeted English-language tweets mentioning COVID-19 during March 10-29, 2020. Findings The main themes identified for the 87 qualifying tweets accounting for 14 million retweets were: lockdown life; attitude towards social restrictions; politics; safety messages; people with COVID-19; support for key workers; work; and COVID-19 facts/news. Research limitations/implications Twitter played many positive roles, mainly through unofficial tweets. Users shared social distancing information, helped build support for social distancing, criticised government responses, expressed support for key workers and helped each other cope with social isolation. A few popular tweets not supporting social distancing show that government messages sometimes failed. Practical implications Public health campaigns in future may consider encouraging grass roots social web activity to support campaign goals. At a methodological level, analysing retweet counts emphasised politics and ignored practical implementation issues. Originality/value This is the first qualitative analysis of general COVID-19-related retweeting.
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 72(2020) no.6, S.945-962
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Search engine coverage bias : evidence and possible causes (2004)
0.02
0.015912538 = product of:
0.039781343 = sum of:
0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02918537 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 2536) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=2536,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2536, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2536)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 14. 8.2004 10:30:29
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.4, S.693-708
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.013228674 = product of:
0.033071686 = sum of:
0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02432114 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.008750545 = product of:
0.026251635 = sum of:
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 67(2015) no.6, S.614-635
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.01
0.013228674 = product of:
0.033071686 = sum of:
0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02432114 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.008750545 = product of:
0.026251635 = sum of:
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.4 = coord(2/5)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Source
- Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.2, S.174-183
-
Thelwall, M.; Vann, K.; Fairclough, R.: Web issue analysis : an integrated water resource management case study (2006)
0.01
0.00825487 = product of:
0.04127435 = sum of:
0.04127435 = weight(_text_:management in 5906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04127435 = score(doc=5906,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.31599492 = fieldWeight in 5906, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=5906)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- In this article Web issue analysis is introduced as a new technique to investigate an issue as reflected on the Web. The issue chosen, integrated water resource management (IWRM), is a United Nations-initiated paradigm for managing water resources in an international context, particularly in developing nations. As with many international governmental initiatives, there is a considerable body of online information about it: 41.381 hypertext markup language (HTML) pages and 28.735 PDF documents mentioning the issue were downloaded. A page uniform resource locator (URL) and link analysis revealed the international and sectoral spread of IWRM. A noun and noun phrase occurrence analysis was used to identify the issues most commonly discussed, revealing some unexpected topics such as private sector and economic growth. Although the complexity of the methods required to produce meaningful statistics from the data is disadvantageous to easy interpretation, it was still possible to produce data that could be subject to a reasonably intuitive interpretation. Hence Web issue analysis is claimed to be a useful new technique for information science.
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.01
0.007032209 = product of:
0.035161044 = sum of:
0.035161044 = product of:
0.052741565 = sum of:
0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02648993 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.026251635 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.026251635 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: ¬A modelling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns : the case of Canadian universities (2005)
0.01
0.0068099196 = product of:
0.034049597 = sum of:
0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 1014) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034049597 = score(doc=1014,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1014, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1014)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.2, S.347-360
-
Payne, N.; Thelwall, M.: Mathematical models for academic webs : linear relationship or non-linear power law? (2005)
0.01
0.0068099196 = product of:
0.034049597 = sum of:
0.034049597 = weight(_text_:management in 1066) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.034049597 = score(doc=1066,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.2606825 = fieldWeight in 1066, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=1066)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 41(2005) no.6, S.1495-1510
-
Thelwall, M.; Wilkinson, D.: Finding similar academic Web sites with links, bibliometric couplings and colinks (2004)
0.01
0.005837074 = product of:
0.02918537 = sum of:
0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 2571) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02918537 = score(doc=2571,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2571, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2571)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Information processing and management. 40(2004) no.3, S.515-526
-
Angus, E.; Thelwall, M.; Stuart, D.: General patterns of tag usage among university groups in Flickr (2008)
0.01
0.005837074 = product of:
0.02918537 = sum of:
0.02918537 = weight(_text_:management in 2554) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02918537 = score(doc=2554,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.22344214 = fieldWeight in 2554, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2554)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Purpose - The purpose of this research is to investigate general patterns of tag usage and determines the usefulness of the tags used within university image groups to the wider Flickr community. There has been a significant rise in the use of Web 2.0 social network web sites and online applications in recent years. One of the most popular is Flickr, an online image management application. Design/methodology/approach - This study uses a webometric data collection, classification and informetric analysis. Findings - The results show that members of university image groups tend to tag in a manner that is of use to users of the system as a whole rather than merely for the tag creator. Originality/value - This paper gives a valuable insight into the tagging practices of image groups in Flickr.
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Academic collaboration rates and citation associations vary substantially between countries and fields (2020)
0.00
0.0048642284 = product of:
0.02432114 = sum of:
0.02432114 = weight(_text_:management in 5952) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02432114 = score(doc=5952,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13061713 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.18620178 = fieldWeight in 5952, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3706124 = idf(docFreq=4130, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=5952)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Research collaboration is promoted by governments and research funders, but if the relative prevalence and merits of collaboration vary internationally then different national and disciplinary strategies may be needed to promote it. This study compares the team size and field normalized citation impact of research across all 27 Scopus broad fields in the 10 countries with the most journal articles indexed in Scopus 2008-2012. The results show that team size varies substantially by discipline and country, with Japan (4.2) having two-thirds more authors per article than the United Kingdom (2.5). Solo authorship is rare in China (4%) but common in the United Kingdom (27%). While increasing team size associates with higher citation impact in almost all countries and fields, this association is much weaker in China than elsewhere. There are also field differences in the association between citation impact and collaboration. For example, larger team sizes in the Business, Management & Accounting category do not seem to associate with greater research impact, and for China and India, solo authorship associates with higher citation impact in this field. Overall, there are substantial international and field differences in the extent to which researchers collaborate and the extent to which collaboration associates with higher citation impact.
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.00
0.0024750277 = product of:
0.012375139 = sum of:
0.012375139 = product of:
0.037125416 = sum of:
0.037125416 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037125416 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
-
Thelwall, M.: Directing students to new information types : a new role for Google in literature searches? (2005)
0.00
0.0024723937 = product of:
0.012361968 = sum of:
0.012361968 = product of:
0.037085902 = sum of:
0.037085902 = weight(_text_:29 in 364) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.037085902 = score(doc=364,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.27205724 = fieldWeight in 364, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=364)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 3. 6.2007 16:37:29
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate: Disseminating, communicating, and measuring scholarship? (2015)
0.00
0.0021191945 = product of:
0.010595973 = sum of:
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 1813) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=1813,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 1813, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=1813)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 26. 4.2015 19:29:49
-
Maflahi, N.; Thelwall, M.: When are readership counts as useful as citation counts? : Scopus versus Mendeley for LIS journals (2016)
0.00
0.0021191945 = product of:
0.010595973 = sum of:
0.010595973 = product of:
0.031787917 = sum of:
0.031787917 = weight(_text_:29 in 2495) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031787917 = score(doc=2495,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 2495, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2495)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 27.12.2015 11:29:37
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.00
0.0021001308 = product of:
0.010500654 = sum of:
0.010500654 = product of:
0.03150196 = sum of:
0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03150196 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.00
0.0021001308 = product of:
0.010500654 = sum of:
0.010500654 = product of:
0.03150196 = sum of:
0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03150196 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.00
0.0021001308 = product of:
0.010500654 = sum of:
0.010500654 = product of:
0.03150196 = sum of:
0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03150196 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.00
0.0021001308 = product of:
0.010500654 = sum of:
0.010500654 = product of:
0.03150196 = sum of:
0.03150196 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.03150196 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13570201 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Vaughan, L.; Thelwall, M.: Scholarly use of the Web : what are the key inducers of links to journal Web sites? (2003)
0.00
0.0017659955 = product of:
0.008829977 = sum of:
0.008829977 = product of:
0.02648993 = sum of:
0.02648993 = weight(_text_:29 in 1236) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.02648993 = score(doc=1236,freq=2.0), product of:
0.13631654 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.038751747 = queryNorm
0.19432661 = fieldWeight in 1236, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1236)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.2 = coord(1/5)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and technology. 54(2003) no.1, S.29-38
