-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.04
0.041019052 = product of:
0.082038105 = sum of:
0.082038105 = sum of:
0.006218444 = weight(_text_:e in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006218444 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.038910452 = weight(_text_:p in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038910452 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.036909204 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036909204 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023)
0.04
0.03525578 = product of:
0.07051156 = sum of:
0.07051156 = sum of:
0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007328507 = score(doc=995,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.030757671 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030757671 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 6.2023 18:11:50
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.03
0.034182545 = product of:
0.06836509 = sum of:
0.06836509 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.030757671 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030757671 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
- Language
- e
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Citation levels and collaboration within library and information science (2009)
0.02
0.01622665 = product of:
0.0324533 = sum of:
0.0324533 = product of:
0.048679948 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=2734,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.043497913 = weight(_text_:22 in 2734) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.043497913 = score(doc=2734,freq=4.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.27358043 = fieldWeight in 2734, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2734)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Collaboration is a major research policy objective, but does it deliver higher quality research? This study uses citation analysis to examine the Web of Science (WoS) Information Science & Library Science subject category (IS&LS) to ascertain whether, in general, more highly cited articles are more highly collaborative than other articles. It consists of two investigations. The first investigation is a longitudinal comparison of the degree and proportion of collaboration in five strata of citation; it found that collaboration in the highest four citation strata (all in the most highly cited 22%) increased in unison over time, whereas collaboration in the lowest citation strata (un-cited articles) remained low and stable. Given that over 40% of the articles were un-cited, it seems important to take into account the differences found between un-cited articles and relatively highly cited articles when investigating collaboration in IS&LS. The second investigation compares collaboration for 35 influential information scientists; it found that their more highly cited articles on average were not more highly collaborative than their less highly cited articles. In summary, although collaborative research is conducive to high citation in general, collaboration has apparently not tended to be essential to the success of current and former elite information scientists.
- Date
- 22. 3.2009 12:43:51
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.: Mendeley readership altmetrics for medical articles : an analysis of 45 fields (2016)
0.02
0.015042966 = product of:
0.030085932 = sum of:
0.030085932 = product of:
0.045128897 = sum of:
0.006218444 = weight(_text_:e in 3055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006218444 = score(doc=3055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 3055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3055)
0.038910452 = weight(_text_:p in 3055) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.038910452 = score(doc=3055,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.23835106 = fieldWeight in 3055, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3055)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Editor
- Wilson, P.
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.014375883 = product of:
0.028751766 = sum of:
0.028751766 = product of:
0.04312765 = sum of:
0.006218444 = weight(_text_:e in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006218444 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.036909204 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036909204 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
- Language
- e
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.014375883 = product of:
0.028751766 = sum of:
0.028751766 = product of:
0.04312765 = sum of:
0.006218444 = weight(_text_:e in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.006218444 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.09528506 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.036909204 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.036909204 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? : evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 (2023)
0.01
0.013251295 = product of:
0.02650259 = sum of:
0.02650259 = product of:
0.039753884 = sum of:
0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007328507 = score(doc=947,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=947,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Abdoli, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: In which fields are citations indicators of research quality? (2023)
0.01
0.013251295 = product of:
0.02650259 = sum of:
0.02650259 = product of:
0.039753884 = sum of:
0.007328507 = weight(_text_:e in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.007328507 = score(doc=1033,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.112294525 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 1033) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=1033,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 1033, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1033)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: ¬A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations (2011)
0.01
0.012535806 = product of:
0.025071612 = sum of:
0.025071612 = product of:
0.037607417 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Wilson, P.: Does research with statistics have more impact? : the citation rank advantage of structural equation modeling (2016)
0.01
0.012535806 = product of:
0.025071612 = sum of:
0.025071612 = product of:
0.037607417 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 2900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=2900,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 2900, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2900)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Do new research issues attract more citations? : a comparison between 25 Scopus subject categories (2021)
0.01
0.012535806 = product of:
0.025071612 = sum of:
0.025071612 = product of:
0.037607417 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.032425378 = weight(_text_:p in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.032425378 = score(doc=157,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19862589 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: How is science cited on the Web? : a classification of google unique Web citations (2007)
0.01
0.011979903 = product of:
0.023959806 = sum of:
0.023959806 = product of:
0.03593971 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.030757671 = weight(_text_:22 in 586) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030757671 = score(doc=586,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 586, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=586)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Although the analysis of citations in the scholarly literature is now an established and relatively well understood part of information science, not enough is known about citations that can be found on the Web. In particular, are there new Web types, and if so, are these trivial or potentially useful for studying or evaluating research communication? We sought evidence based upon a sample of 1,577 Web citations of the URLs or titles of research articles in 64 open-access journals from biology, physics, chemistry, and computing. Only 25% represented intellectual impact, from references of Web documents (23%) and other informal scholarly sources (2%). Many of the Web/URL citations were created for general or subject-specific navigation (45%) or for self-publicity (22%). Additional analyses revealed significant disciplinary differences in the types of Google unique Web/URL citations as well as some characteristics of scientific open-access publishing on the Web. We conclude that the Web provides access to a new and different type of citation information, one that may therefore enable us to measure different aspects of research, and the research process in particular; but to obtain good information, the different types should be separated.
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.01
0.011979903 = product of:
0.023959806 = sum of:
0.023959806 = product of:
0.03593971 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.030757671 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030757671 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020)
0.01
0.011979903 = product of:
0.023959806 = sum of:
0.023959806 = product of:
0.03593971 = sum of:
0.005182037 = weight(_text_:e in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.005182037 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.07940422 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.030757671 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.030757671 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
- Language
- e
-
Sud, P.; Thelwall, M.: Not all international collaboration is beneficial : the Mendeley readership and citation impact of biochemical research collaboration (2016)
0.01
0.011040248 = product of:
0.022080496 = sum of:
0.022080496 = product of:
0.033120744 = sum of:
0.0071804416 = weight(_text_:e in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0071804416 = score(doc=3048,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.11002572 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
0.0259403 = weight(_text_:p in 3048) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0259403 = score(doc=3048,freq=2.0), product of:
0.1632485 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.15890071 = fieldWeight in 3048, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5955126 = idf(docFreq=3298, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=3048)
0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- This study aims to identify the way researchers collaborate with other researchers in the course of the scientific research life cycle and provide information to the designers of e-Science and e-Research implementations. On the basis of in-depth interviews with and on-site observations of 24 scientists and a follow-up focus group interview in the field of bioscience/nanoscience and technology in Korea, we examined scientific collaboration using the framework of the scientific research life cycle. We attempt to explain the major motiBiochemistry is a highly funded research area that is typified by large research teams and is important for many areas of the life sciences. This article investigates the citation impact and Mendeley readership impact of biochemistry research from 2011 in the Web of Science according to the type of collaboration involved. Negative binomial regression models are used that incorporate, for the first time, the inclusion of specific countries within a team. The results show that, holding other factors constant, larger teams robustly associate with higher impact research, but including additional departments has no effect and adding extra institutions tends to reduce the impact of research. Although international collaboration is apparently not advantageous in general, collaboration with the United States, and perhaps also with some other countries, seems to increase impact. In contrast, collaborations with some other nations seems to decrease impact, although both findings could be due to factors such as differing national proportions of excellent researchers. As a methodological implication, simpler statistical models would find international collaboration to be generally beneficial and so it is important to take into account specific countries when examining collaboration.t only in the beginning phase of the cycle. For communication and information-sharing practices, scientists continue to favor traditional means of communication for security reasons. Barriers to collaboration throughout the phases included different priorities, competitive tensions, and a hierarchical culture among collaborators, whereas credit sharing was a barrier in the research product phase.
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.; Ruschenburg, T.: Grundlagen und Forschungsfelder der Webometrie (2006)
0.01
0.008202046 = product of:
0.016404092 = sum of:
0.016404092 = product of:
0.049212273 = sum of:
0.049212273 = weight(_text_:22 in 77) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.049212273 = score(doc=77,freq=2.0), product of:
0.15899497 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 77, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=77)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 4.12.2006 12:12:22
-
Harries, G.; Wilkinson, D.; Price, L.; Fairclough, R.; Thelwall, M.: Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping : making sense of it all (2005)
0.00
0.0020728149 = product of:
0.0041456297 = sum of:
0.0041456297 = product of:
0.012436888 = sum of:
0.012436888 = weight(_text_:e in 4654) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.012436888 = score(doc=4654,freq=2.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.19057012 = fieldWeight in 4654, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=4654)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Language
- e
-
Larivière, V.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Macaluso, B.; Milojevi´c, S.; Cronin, B.; Thelwall, M.: arXiv E-prints and the journal of record : an analysis of roles and relationships (2014)
0.00
0.0014959252 = product of:
0.0029918505 = sum of:
0.0029918505 = product of:
0.008975551 = sum of:
0.008975551 = weight(_text_:e in 1285) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008975551 = score(doc=1285,freq=6.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.13753214 = fieldWeight in 1285, product of:
2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
6.0 = termFreq=6.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1285)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Since its creation in 1991, arXiv has become central to the diffusion of research in a number of fields. Combining data from the entirety of arXiv and the Web of Science (WoS), this article investigates (a) the proportion of papers across all disciplines that are on arXiv and the proportion of arXiv papers that are in the WoS, (b) the elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication, and (c) the aging characteristics and scientific impact of arXiv e-prints and their published version. It shows that the proportion of WoS papers found on arXiv varies across the specialties of physics and mathematics, and that only a few specialties make extensive use of the repository. Elapsed time between arXiv submission and journal publication has shortened but remains longer in mathematics than in physics. In physics, mathematics, as well as in astronomy and astrophysics, arXiv versions are cited more promptly and decay faster than WoS papers. The arXiv versions of papers-both published and unpublished-have lower citation rates than published papers, although there is almost no difference in the impact of the arXiv versions of published and unpublished papers.
- Language
- e
-
Thelwall, M.: Webometrics (2009)
0.00
0.0014657015 = product of:
0.002931403 = sum of:
0.002931403 = product of:
0.008794209 = sum of:
0.008794209 = weight(_text_:e in 3906) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.008794209 = score(doc=3906,freq=4.0), product of:
0.06526148 = queryWeight, product of:
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.0454034 = queryNorm
0.13475344 = fieldWeight in 3906, product of:
2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
4.0 = termFreq=4.0
1.43737 = idf(docFreq=28552, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3906)
0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Vgl.: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/book/10.1081/E-ELIS3.
- Language
- e
