Search (36 results, page 1 of 2)

  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  • × theme_ss:"Informetrie"
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Can Amazon.com reviews help to assess the wider impacts of books? (2016) 0.01
    0.013986527 = product of:
      0.027973054 = sum of:
        0.027973054 = product of:
          0.04195958 = sum of:
            0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038397755 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 2768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=2768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2768)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.3, S.566-581
  2. Orduna-Malea, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Web citations in patents : evidence of technological impact? (2017) 0.01
    0.013986527 = product of:
      0.027973054 = sum of:
        0.027973054 = product of:
          0.04195958 = sum of:
            0.038397755 = weight(_text_:k in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.038397755 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.23664509 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 3764) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=3764,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3764, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3764)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.8, S.1967-1974
  3. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016) 0.01
    0.013503913 = product of:
      0.027007826 = sum of:
        0.027007826 = product of:
          0.04051174 = sum of:
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
            0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036949914 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2016 12:22:00
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.4, S.960-966
  4. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 0.01
    0.013503913 = product of:
      0.027007826 = sum of:
        0.027007826 = product of:
          0.04051174 = sum of:
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
            0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036949914 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2016 11:07:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.12, S.3036-3050
  5. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018) 0.01
    0.013503913 = product of:
      0.027007826 = sum of:
        0.027007826 = product of:
          0.04051174 = sum of:
            0.003561823 = weight(_text_:s in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.003561823 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
            0.036949914 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036949914 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2018 10:00:22
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 69(2018) no.8, S.959-973
  6. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011) 0.01
    0.01206526 = product of:
      0.02413052 = sum of:
        0.02413052 = product of:
          0.036195777 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
            0.0041976487 = weight(_text_:s in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041976487 = score(doc=4920,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2147-2164
  7. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1710-1727
  8. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2015) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 66(2015) no.2, S.309-320
  9. Mohammadi, E.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: Can Mendeley bookmarks reflect readership? : a survey of user motivations (2016) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 2897) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=2897,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 2897, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2897)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 67(2016) no.5, S.1198-1209
  10. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Patent citation analysis with Google (2017) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3317) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3317,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3317, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3317)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.1, S.48-61
  11. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ResearchGate articles : age, discipline, audience size, and impact (2017) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3349) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3349,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3349, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3349)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.2, S.468-479
  12. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.3, S.762-779
  13. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: News stories as evidence for research? : BBC citations from articles, Books, and Wikipedia (2017) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3760) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3760,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3760, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3760)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.8, S.2017-2028
  14. Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: SlideShare presentations, citations, users, and trends : a professional site with academic and educational uses (2017) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3766) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3766,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3766, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3766)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.8, S.1989-2003
  15. Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: Goodreads reviews to assess the wider impacts of books (2017) 0.01
    0.011655438 = product of:
      0.023310876 = sum of:
        0.023310876 = product of:
          0.034966312 = sum of:
            0.031998128 = weight(_text_:k in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.031998128 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.16225883 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19720423 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.569778 = idf(docFreq=3384, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3768) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3768,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3768, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3768)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 68(2017) no.8, S.2004-2016
  16. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.01
    0.01125326 = product of:
      0.02250652 = sum of:
        0.02250652 = product of:
          0.03375978 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
            0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030791596 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.4, S.805-816
  17. Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017) 0.01
    0.01125326 = product of:
      0.02250652 = sum of:
        0.02250652 = product of:
          0.03375978 = sum of:
            0.0029681858 = weight(_text_:s in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0029681858 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.060061958 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
            0.030791596 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030791596 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15917034 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.6666667 = coord(2/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
    Source
    Aslib journal of information management. 69(2017) no.2, S.174-183
  18. Thelwall, M.: Web indicators for research evaluation : a practical guide (2016) 0.00
    8.5684157E-4 = product of:
      0.0017136831 = sum of:
        0.0017136831 = product of:
          0.005141049 = sum of:
            0.005141049 = weight(_text_:s in 3384) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.005141049 = score(doc=3384,freq=6.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.10403037 = fieldWeight in 3384, product of:
                  2.4494898 = tf(freq=6.0), with freq of:
                    6.0 = termFreq=6.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3384)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    In recent years there has been an increasing demand for research evaluation within universities and other research-based organisations. In parallel, there has been an increasing recognition that traditional citation-based indicators are not able to reflect the societal impacts of research and are slow to appear. This has led to the creation of new indicators for different types of research impact as well as timelier indicators, mainly derived from the Web. These indicators have been called altmetrics, webometrics or just web metrics. This book describes and evaluates a range of web indicators for aspects of societal or scholarly impact, discusses the theory and practice of using and evaluating web indicators for research assessment and outlines practical strategies for obtaining many web indicators. In addition to describing impact indicators for traditional scholarly outputs, such as journal articles and monographs, it also covers indicators for videos, datasets, software and other non-standard scholarly outputs. The book describes strategies to analyse web indicators for individual publications as well as to compare the impacts of groups of publications. The practical part of the book includes descriptions of how to use the free software Webometric Analyst to gather and analyse web data. This book is written for information science undergraduate and Master?s students that are learning about alternative indicators or scientometrics as well as Ph.D. students and other researchers and practitioners using indicators to help assess research impact or to study scholarly communication.
    Footnote
    Rez. in: JASIST 69(2018) no.3, S.498-499 (Isidro F. Aguillo).
    Pages
    170 S
  19. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: ¬A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations (2011) 0.00
    6.996081E-4 = product of:
      0.0013992162 = sum of:
        0.0013992162 = product of:
          0.0041976487 = sum of:
            0.0041976487 = weight(_text_:s in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041976487 = score(doc=4626,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The primary webometric method for estimating the online impact of an organization is to count links to its website. Link counts have been available from commercial search engines for over a decade but this was set to end by early 2012 and so a replacement is needed. This article compares link counts to two alternative methods: URL citations and organization title mentions. New variations of these methods are also introduced. The three methods are compared against each other using Yahoo!. Two of the three methods (URL citations and organization title mentions) are also compared against each other using Bing. Evidence from a case study of 131 UK universities and 49 US Library and Information Science (LIS) departments suggests that Bing's Hit Count Estimates (HCEs) for popular title searches are not useful for webometric research but that Yahoo!'s HCEs for all three types of search and Bing's URL citation HCEs seem to be consistent. For exact URL counts the results of all three methods in Yahoo! and both methods in Bing are also consistent. Four types of accuracy factors are also introduced and defined: search engine coverage, search engine retrieval variation, search engine retrieval anomalies, and query polysemy.
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1488-1497
  20. Haustein, S.; Peters, I.; Sugimoto, C.R.; Thelwall, M.; Larivière, V.: Tweeting biomedicine : an analysis of tweets and citations in the biomedical literature (2014) 0.00
    6.996081E-4 = product of:
      0.0013992162 = sum of:
        0.0013992162 = product of:
          0.0041976487 = sum of:
            0.0041976487 = weight(_text_:s in 1229) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0041976487 = score(doc=1229,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.049418733 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.04545348 = queryNorm
                0.08494043 = fieldWeight in 1229, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1229)
          0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Source
    Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 65(2014) no.4, S.656-669