-
Thelwall, M.: Quantitative comparisons of search engine results (2008)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2350) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=2350,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2350, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2350)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.11, S.1702-1710
-
Levitt, J.M.; Thelwall, M.: Is multidisciplinary research more highly cited? : a macrolevel study (2008)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2375) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=2375,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2375, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2375)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 59(2008) no.12, S.1973-1984
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Google book search : citation analysis for social science and the humanities (2009)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 2946) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=2946,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 2946, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2946)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 60(2009) no.8, S.1537-1549
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: ¬A comparison of methods for collecting web citation data for academic organizations (2011)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 4626) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=4626,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 4626, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4626)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.8, S.1488-1497
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Rezaie, S.: Assessing the citation impact of books : the role of Google Books, Google Scholar, and Scopus (2011)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 4920) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=4920,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 4920, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4920)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 62(2011) no.11, S.2147-2164
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.; Abdoli, M.: ¬The role of online videos in research communication : a content analysis of YouTube videos cited in academic publications (2012)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 382) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=382,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 382, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=382)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 63(2012) no.9, S.1710-1727
-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: Are wikipedia citations important evidence of the impact of scholarly articles and books? (2017)
0.01
0.007998354 = product of:
0.015996708 = sum of:
0.015996708 = product of:
0.031993415 = sum of:
0.031993415 = weight(_text_:society in 3440) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.031993415 = score(doc=3440,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.18424435 = fieldWeight in 3440, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3440)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Individual academics and research evaluators often need to assess the value of published research. Although citation counts are a recognized indicator of scholarly impact, alternative data is needed to provide evidence of other types of impact, including within education and wider society. Wikipedia is a logical choice for both of these because the role of a general encyclopaedia is to be an understandable repository of facts about a diverse array of topics and hence it may cite research to support its claims. To test whether Wikipedia could provide new evidence about the impact of scholarly research, this article counted citations to 302,328 articles and 18,735 monographs in English indexed by Scopus in the period 2005 to 2012. The results show that citations from Wikipedia to articles are too rare for most research evaluation purposes, with only 5% of articles being cited in all fields. In contrast, a third of monographs have at least one citation from Wikipedia, with the most in the arts and humanities. Hence, Wikipedia citations can provide extra impact evidence for academic monographs. Nevertheless, the results may be relatively easily manipulated and so Wikipedia is not recommended for evaluations affecting stakeholder interests.
-
Barjak, F.; Li, X.; Thelwall, M.: Which factors explain the Web impact of scientists' personal homepages? (2007)
0.01
0.006398683 = product of:
0.012797366 = sum of:
0.012797366 = product of:
0.025594732 = sum of:
0.025594732 = weight(_text_:society in 73) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.025594732 = score(doc=73,freq=2.0), product of:
0.17364666 = queryWeight, product of:
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.05206517 = queryNorm
0.14739548 = fieldWeight in 73, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.3351789 = idf(docFreq=4279, maxDocs=44218)
0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=73)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Source
- Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 58(2007) no.2, S.200-211
