Search (10 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Thelwall, M."
  • × year_i:[2010 TO 2020}
  1. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Determinants of research citation impact in nanoscience and nanotechnology (2013) 0.02
    0.021378826 = product of:
      0.042757653 = sum of:
        0.042757653 = product of:
          0.085515305 = sum of:
            0.085515305 = weight(_text_:2007 in 737) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.085515305 = score(doc=737,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.42323765 = fieldWeight in 737, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=737)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    This study investigates a range of metrics available when a nanoscience and nanotechnology article is published to see which metrics correlate more with the number of citations to the article. It also introduces the degree of internationality of journals and references as new metrics for this purpose. The journal impact factor; the impact of references; the internationality of authors, journals, and references; and the number of authors, institutions, and references were all calculated for papers published in nanoscience and nanotechnology journals in the Web of Science from 2007 to 2009. Using a zero-inflated negative binomial regression model on the data set, the impact factor of the publishing journal and the citation impact of the cited references were found to be the most effective determinants of citation counts in all four time periods. In the entire 2007 to 2009 period, apart from journal internationality and author numbers and internationality, all other predictor variables had significant effects on citation counts.
  2. Wilkinson, D.; Thelwall, M.: Social network site changes over time : the case of MySpace (2010) 0.01
    0.0125975935 = product of:
      0.025195187 = sum of:
        0.025195187 = product of:
          0.050390374 = sum of:
            0.050390374 = weight(_text_:2007 in 4106) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.050390374 = score(doc=4106,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.20205033 = queryWeight, product of:
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.24939516 = fieldWeight in 4106, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  4.514535 = idf(docFreq=1315, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4106)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    The uptake of social network sites (SNSs) has been highly trend-driven, with Friendster, MySpace, and Facebook being successively the most popular. Given that teens are often early adopters of communication technologies, it seems reasonable to assume that the typical user of any particular SNS would change over time, probably becoming older and covering different segments of the population. This article analyzes changes in MySpace self-reported member demographics and behavior from 2007 to 2010 using four large samples of members and focusing on the United States. The results indicate that despite its take-up rate declining, with only about 1 in 10 members being active a year after joining, the dominant (modal) age for active U.S. members remains midadolescence, but has shifted by about 2 years from 15 to 17, and the U.S. dominance of MySpace is shrinking. There also has been a dramatic increase in the median number of Friends for new U.S. members, from 12 to 96-probably due to MySpace's automated Friend Finder. Some factors show little change, however, including the female majority, the 5% minority gay membership, and the approximately 50% private profiles. In addition, there has been an increase in the proportion of Latino/Hispanic U.S. members, suggesting a shifting ethnic profile. Overall, MySpace has surprisingly stable membership demographics and is apparently maintaining its primary youth appeal, perhaps because of its music orientation.
  3. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011) 0.01
    0.009095631 = product of:
      0.018191261 = sum of:
        0.018191261 = product of:
          0.036382522 = sum of:
            0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382522 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:27:06
  4. Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016) 0.01
    0.009095631 = product of:
      0.018191261 = sum of:
        0.018191261 = product of:
          0.036382522 = sum of:
            0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382522 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    19. 3.2016 12:22:00
  5. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016) 0.01
    0.009095631 = product of:
      0.018191261 = sum of:
        0.018191261 = product of:
          0.036382522 = sum of:
            0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382522 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    16.11.2016 11:07:22
  6. Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018) 0.01
    0.009095631 = product of:
      0.018191261 = sum of:
        0.018191261 = product of:
          0.036382522 = sum of:
            0.036382522 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.036382522 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    28. 7.2018 10:00:22
  7. Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010) 0.01
    0.007579693 = product of:
      0.015159386 = sum of:
        0.015159386 = product of:
          0.030318772 = sum of:
            0.030318772 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030318772 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    22. 1.2011 14:29:23
  8. Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012) 0.01
    0.007579693 = product of:
      0.015159386 = sum of:
        0.015159386 = product of:
          0.030318772 = sum of:
            0.030318772 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030318772 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    6. 4.2012 18:16:22
  9. Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015) 0.01
    0.007579693 = product of:
      0.015159386 = sum of:
        0.015159386 = product of:
          0.030318772 = sum of:
            0.030318772 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030318772 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22
  10. Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017) 0.01
    0.007579693 = product of:
      0.015159386 = sum of:
        0.015159386 = product of:
          0.030318772 = sum of:
            0.030318772 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.030318772 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.15672618 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.044755515 = queryNorm
                0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Date
    20. 1.2015 18:30:22