-
Kousha, K.; Thelwall, M.: ¬An automatic method for extracting citations from Google Books (2015)
0.01
0.01168419 = product of:
0.02336838 = sum of:
0.02336838 = product of:
0.04673676 = sum of:
0.04673676 = weight(_text_:searching in 1658) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04673676 = score(doc=1658,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2091384 = queryWeight, product of:
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.22347288 = fieldWeight in 1658, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.0452914 = idf(docFreq=2103, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1658)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Recent studies have shown that counting citations from books can help scholarly impact assessment and that Google Books (GB) is a useful source of such citation counts, despite its lack of a public citation index. Searching GB for citations produces approximate matches, however, and so its raw results need time-consuming human filtering. In response, this article introduces a method to automatically remove false and irrelevant matches from GB citation searches in addition to introducing refinements to a previous GB manual citation extraction method. The method was evaluated by manual checking of sampled GB results and comparing citations to about 14,500 monographs in the Thomson Reuters Book Citation Index (BKCI) against automatically extracted citations from GB across 24 subject areas. GB citations were 103% to 137% as numerous as BKCI citations in the humanities, except for tourism (72%) and linguistics (91%), 46% to 85% in social sciences, but only 8% to 53% in the sciences. In all cases, however, GB had substantially more citing books than did BKCI, with BKCI's results coming predominantly from journal articles. Moderate correlations between the GB and BKCI citation counts in social sciences and humanities, with most BKCI results coming from journal articles rather than books, suggests that they could measure the different aspects of impact, however.
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.: Sentiment in Twitter events (2011)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 4345) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=4345,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4345, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4345)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:27:06
-
Thelwall, M.; Maflahi, N.: Guideline references and academic citations as evidence of the clinical value of health research (2016)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 2856) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=2856,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 2856, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2856)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 19. 3.2016 12:22:00
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Mendeley readership counts : an investigation of temporal and disciplinary differences (2016)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 3211) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=3211,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 3211, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3211)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 16.11.2016 11:07:22
-
Didegah, F.; Thelwall, M.: Co-saved, co-tweeted, and co-cited networks (2018)
0.01
0.010506795 = product of:
0.02101359 = sum of:
0.02101359 = product of:
0.04202718 = sum of:
0.04202718 = weight(_text_:22 in 4291) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.04202718 = score(doc=4291,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.23214069 = fieldWeight in 4291, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4291)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 28. 7.2018 10:00:22
-
Thelwall, M.; Buckley, K.; Paltoglou, G.; Cai, D.; Kappas, A.: Sentiment strength detection in short informal text (2010)
0.01
0.008755663 = product of:
0.017511327 = sum of:
0.017511327 = product of:
0.035022654 = sum of:
0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 4200) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035022654 = score(doc=4200,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 4200, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=4200)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 1.2011 14:29:23
-
Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.; Wilkinson, D.: Link and co-inlink network diagrams with URL citations or title mentions (2012)
0.01
0.008755663 = product of:
0.017511327 = sum of:
0.017511327 = product of:
0.035022654 = sum of:
0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 57) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035022654 = score(doc=57,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 57, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=57)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 6. 4.2012 18:16:22
-
Li, X.; Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.: ¬The role of arXiv, RePEc, SSRN and PMC in formal scholarly communication (2015)
0.01
0.008755663 = product of:
0.017511327 = sum of:
0.017511327 = product of:
0.035022654 = sum of:
0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 2593) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035022654 = score(doc=2593,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 2593, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=2593)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
-
Thelwall, M.: Are Mendeley reader counts high enough for research evaluations when articles are published? (2017)
0.01
0.008755663 = product of:
0.017511327 = sum of:
0.017511327 = product of:
0.035022654 = sum of:
0.035022654 = weight(_text_:22 in 3806) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.035022654 = score(doc=3806,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18104185 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.051699217 = queryNorm
0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 3806, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=3806)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 20. 1.2015 18:30:22
