Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Thelwall, M.; Foster, D.: Male or female gender-polarized YouTube videos are less viewed (2021) 0.03

0.03137991 = product of:
  0.06275982 = sum of:
    0.06275982 = product of:
      0.18827944 = sum of:
        0.18827944 = weight(_text_:2021 in 414) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.18827944 = score(doc=414,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.31593576 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.68562 = idf(docFreq=407, maxDocs=44218)
              0.055567514 = queryNorm
            0.59594214 = fieldWeight in 414, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.68562 = idf(docFreq=407, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=414)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.12, S.1528-1544
Year: 2021

Thelwall, M.; Sud, P.: Do new research issues attract more citations? : a comparison between 25 Scopus subject categories (2021) 0.03

0.026149921 = product of:
  0.052299842 = sum of:
    0.052299842 = product of:
      0.15689953 = sum of:
        0.15689953 = weight(_text_:2021 in 157) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.15689953 = score(doc=157,freq=5.0), product of:
            0.31593576 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.68562 = idf(docFreq=407, maxDocs=44218)
              0.055567514 = queryNorm
            0.49661845 = fieldWeight in 157, product of:
              2.236068 = tf(freq=5.0), with freq of:
                5.0 = termFreq=5.0
              5.68562 = idf(docFreq=407, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=157)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Source: Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 72(2021) no.3, S.269-279
Year: 2021

Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Do altmetric scores reflect article quality? : evidence from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 (2023) 0.02
```
0.023389202 = product of:
  0.046778403 = sum of:
    0.046778403 = product of:
      0.1403352 = sum of:
        0.1403352 = weight(_text_:2021 in 947) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.1403352 = score(doc=947,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.31593576 = queryWeight, product of:
              5.68562 = idf(docFreq=407, maxDocs=44218)
              0.055567514 = queryNorm
            0.44418904 = fieldWeight in 947, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              5.68562 = idf(docFreq=407, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=947)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
```
Abstract

Altmetrics are web-based quantitative impact or attention indicators for academic articles that have been proposed to supplement citation counts. This article reports the first assessment of the extent to which mature altmetrics from Altmetric.com and Mendeley associate with individual article quality scores. It exploits expert norm-referenced peer review scores from the UK Research Excellence Framework 2021 for 67,030+ journal articles in all fields 2014-2017/2018, split into 34 broadly field-based Units of Assessment (UoAs). Altmetrics correlated more strongly with research quality than previously found, although less strongly than raw and field normalized Scopus citation counts. Surprisingly, field normalizing citation counts can reduce their strength as a quality indicator for articles in a single field. For most UoAs, Mendeley reader counts are the best altmetric (e.g., three Spearman correlations with quality scores above 0.5), tweet counts are also a moderate strength indicator in eight UoAs (Spearman correlations with quality scores above 0.3), ahead of news (eight correlations above 0.3, but generally weaker), blogs (five correlations above 0.3), and Facebook (three correlations above 0.3) citations, at least in the United Kingdom. In general, altmetrics are the strongest indicators of research quality in the health and physical sciences and weakest in the arts and humanities.

Thelwall, M.; Thelwall, S.: ¬A thematic analysis of highly retweeted early COVID-19 tweets : consensus, information, dissent and lockdown life (2020) 0.01

0.009410788 = product of:
  0.018821577 = sum of:
    0.018821577 = product of:
      0.037643153 = sum of:
        0.037643153 = weight(_text_:22 in 178) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037643153 = score(doc=178,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19458796 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.055567514 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 178, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=178)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 20. 1.2015 18:30:22

Thelwall, M.; Kousha, K.; Abdoli, M.; Stuart, E.; Makita, M.; Wilson, P.; Levitt, J.: Why are coauthored academic articles more cited : higher quality or larger audience? (2023) 0.01

0.009410788 = product of:
  0.018821577 = sum of:
    0.018821577 = product of:
      0.037643153 = sum of:
        0.037643153 = weight(_text_:22 in 995) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.037643153 = score(doc=995,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.19458796 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.055567514 = queryNorm
            0.19345059 = fieldWeight in 995, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=995)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)

Date: 22. 6.2023 18:11:50

Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

Authors