Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Thiessen, P."
  1. Albrecht, R.; Block, B.; Kratzer, M.; Thiessen, P.: Quantität als Qualität : was die Verbünde zur Verbesserung der Inhaltserschließung beitragen können (2021) 0.03 
    0.027758468 = product of:
  0.11103387 = sum of:
    0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022534605 = score(doc=378,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
    0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022534605 = score(doc=378,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
    0.020895448 = weight(_text_:der in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.020895448 = score(doc=378,freq=10.0), product of:
        0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.38630107 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          3.1622777 = tf(freq=10.0), with freq of:
            10.0 = termFreq=10.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
    0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022534605 = score(doc=378,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
    0.022534605 = weight(_text_:und in 378) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.022534605 = score(doc=378,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.41987535 = fieldWeight in 378, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=378)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Im Standardwerk Bibliothekarisches Grundwissen verwendet der Autor für die "inhaltliche Beschreibung und Erschließung" von Ressourcen den klassischen Begriff Sacherschließung und subsumiert darunter die Schlagwortvergabe, die klassifikatorische Sacherschließung sowie weitere Verfahren der Sacherschließung wie maschinelle Verfahren oder von Benutzer:innen vergebene Tags. Daneben hat sich in den vergangenen zehn Jahren für den gleichen Sachverhalt auch der Begriff Inhaltserschließung herausgebildet. Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek (DNB) nutzt ihn konsequent für alle von ihr eingesetzten Anwendungen und Verfahren für die inhaltliche Beschreibung ihrer Medien und nennt auch die dafür zuständige organisatorische Einheit "Abteilung Inhaltserschließung". Im nachfolgenden Text werden die beiden Begriffe Sacherschließung und Inhaltserschließung deshalb ebenfalls synonym verwendet.
    Series
    Bibliotheks- und Informationspraxis; 70
    Source
    Qualität in der Inhaltserschließung. Hrsg.: M. Franke-Maier, u.a
  2. Thiessen, P.: ¬Die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrates "zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020" : Inhalt und kritische Bewertung im Hinblick auf das wissenschaftliche Bibliothekswesen (2013) 0.02 
    0.024220336 = product of:
  0.096881345 = sum of:
    0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019315375 = score(doc=2456,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
    0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019315375 = score(doc=2456,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
    0.019619841 = weight(_text_:der in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019619841 = score(doc=2456,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.36271852 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
    0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019315375 = score(doc=2456,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
    0.019315375 = weight(_text_:und in 2456) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.019315375 = score(doc=2456,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.35989314 = fieldWeight in 2456, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2456)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Abstract
    Von verschiedenen wissenschaftspolitischen Expertengremien sind in den letzten Jahren Analysen und Entwicklungsvorschläge zur Situation der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland vorgelegt worden. Der Wissenschaftsrat thematisierte 2012 mit seinen jüngsten "Empfehlungen zur Weiterentwicklung der wissenschaftlichen Informationsinfrastrukturen in Deutschland bis 2020" vor allem Fragen der strukturellen Organisation und Koordination von Einrichtungen aus dem Bereich der Informationsinfrastrukturen. Inwieweit die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats dabei auf Belange des wissenschaftlichen Bibliothekswesens eingehen, soll im vorliegenden Beitrag betrachtet werden. Dazu werden die Empfehlungen des Wissenschaftsrats zunächst in den bibliothekspolitischen Kontext eingeordnet (Abschnitt 1.1 und 1.3) und in ihren relevanten Aspekten vorgestellt (Abschnitt 1.2). In einer kritischen Analyse werden daraufhin wesentliche Punkte des Papiers diskutiert (Abschnitt 2), die im Hinblick auf ihre Auswirkungen auf das wissenschaftliche Bibliothekswesen in Deutschland bewertet (Abschnitt 3) werden. Als tendenziell problematisch erweisen sich dabei u. a. die Aussagen des Wissenschaftsrat zum Thema Open Access sowie zu den Finanzierungsmodalitäten künftiger Informationsinfrastrukturen und ihrer vorgeschlagenen zentralen Steuerung.
  3. Albrecht, R.; Meßmer, G.; Rusch, B.; Thiessen, P.: Katalogisierung in der Datenwolke (2016) 0.02 
    0.023071792 = product of:
  0.09228717 = sum of:
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
    0.018689455 = weight(_text_:der in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018689455 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.054091092 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34551817 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.2337668 = idf(docFreq=12875, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 3740) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=3740,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 3740, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=3740)
  0.25 = coord(5/20)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.xxx-xxx
  4. Kratzer, M.; Lohrum, S.; Risch, U.; Thiessen, P.: Zum Stand des Projektes 'Cloudbasierte Infrastruktur für Bibliotheksdaten' (CIB) (2016) 0.01 
    0.014719543 = product of:
  0.073597714 = sum of:
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
    0.018399429 = weight(_text_:und in 2473) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.018399429 = score(doc=2473,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.05366975 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.024215192 = queryNorm
        0.34282678 = fieldWeight in 2473, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
          0.109375 = fieldNorm(doc=2473)
  0.2 = coord(4/20)
    Source
    Zeitschrift für Bibliothekswesen und Bibliographie. 63(2016) H.5/6, S.250-257

Authors

Years

Themes