Search (7 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Thomas, C."
  1. Thomas, C.: FIZe: Die Herausforderung liegt in der Differenzierung (2002) 0.01
    0.0073292386 = product of:
      0.014658477 = sum of:
        0.014658477 = product of:
          0.029316954 = sum of:
            0.029316954 = weight(_text_:d in 470) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.029316954 = score(doc=470,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.33585307 = fieldWeight in 470, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=470)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
  2. Krause, T.; Thomas, C.: "Weltweit wettbewerbsfähige Arbeitsbedingungen für die deutsche Wissenschaft" : Informationspolitik (2005) 0.00
    0.003886916 = product of:
      0.007773832 = sum of:
        0.007773832 = product of:
          0.015547664 = sum of:
            0.015547664 = weight(_text_:d in 3381) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.015547664 = score(doc=3381,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.178113 = fieldWeight in 3381, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3381)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
    Location
    D
  3. Koenemann, J.; Lindner, H.-G.; Thomas, C.: Unternehmensportale : Von Suchmaschinen zum Wissensmanagement (2000) 0.00
    0.0032065418 = product of:
      0.0064130835 = sum of:
        0.0064130835 = product of:
          0.012826167 = sum of:
            0.012826167 = weight(_text_:d in 5233) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.012826167 = score(doc=5233,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.14693572 = fieldWeight in 5233, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5233)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
  4. Thomas, C.; McDonald, R.H.; McDowell, C.S.: Overview - Repositories by the numbers (2007) 0.00
    0.0022673677 = product of:
      0.0045347353 = sum of:
        0.0045347353 = product of:
          0.009069471 = sum of:
            0.009069471 = weight(_text_:d in 1169) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.009069471 = score(doc=1169,freq=4.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.10389925 = fieldWeight in 1169, product of:
                  2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                    4.0 = termFreq=4.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.02734375 = fieldNorm(doc=1169)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Abstract
    While each article is concerned with different aspects and measurements of repositories, two themes are common to both articles. First, the authors of both articles explain difficulties involved in gathering and comparing data from a variety of systems and organizations. Just as the definition and purpose of a digital scholarly repository is likely to vary among scholars, disciplines and organizations, obtaining and comparing similar data about each analyzed repository was a major challenge for both studies. In some instances, data from individual repositories were so dissimilar, or introduced so many uncertainties, that some repositories could not be measured as part of the study. Co-authors Thomas and McDonald give a lengthy explanation of these issues, and call for the scholarly digital repository community to begin work on some common reporting standards and guidelines. The second theme common to both articles is the value of automated harvesting and analysis of data from repositories. Harnad (2006) explained the value of real-time data gathered from repositories; the Repositories by the Numbers authors detail the manual tabulation and analysis that was required in an environment of inconsistent and uncertain data gathered from a variety of scholarly digital repositories. However, both articles acknowledge the need for more automated harvesters to gather and analyze various data on the characteristics and contents of repositories. Each article analyzes different characteristics of repositories. Even so, important topics like deposit mandates, research impact, and repository categorization inevitably are discussed as important considerations when evaluating many different aspects of scholarly digital repositories. By drawing upon the latest and most authoritative literature across the spectrum of digital repository research and debate, and by introducing new and thoughtful insights into the current state of digital repositories, the authors of both Repositories by the Numbers articles give D-Lib's readers useful reports to consider as they construct their respective pieces of the emerging digital repository.
    Source
    D-Lib magazine. 13(2007) nos.9/10, x S
  5. Thomas, C.: Wikipedia : Times Mager (2008) 0.00
    0.0018323096 = product of:
      0.0036646193 = sum of:
        0.0036646193 = product of:
          0.0073292386 = sum of:
            0.0073292386 = weight(_text_:d in 1822) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0073292386 = score(doc=1822,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.08396327 = fieldWeight in 1822, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=1822)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
  6. Thomas, C.: Blackout : Leitartikel (2012) 0.00
    0.0013742321 = product of:
      0.0027484642 = sum of:
        0.0027484642 = product of:
          0.0054969285 = sum of:
            0.0054969285 = weight(_text_:d in 4882) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0054969285 = score(doc=4882,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.06297245 = fieldWeight in 4882, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0234375 = fieldNorm(doc=4882)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d
  7. Thomas, C.: ¬Der Bote aus der Ferne : Hermeneutik der Erfahrung: Anmerkungen aus Anlass des Todes von Hans-Georg Gadamer (2002) 0.00
    9.161548E-4 = product of:
      0.0018323096 = sum of:
        0.0018323096 = product of:
          0.0036646193 = sum of:
            0.0036646193 = weight(_text_:d in 2140) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.0036646193 = score(doc=2140,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.08729101 = queryWeight, product of:
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.045945734 = queryNorm
                0.041981634 = fieldWeight in 2140, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  1.899872 = idf(docFreq=17979, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.015625 = fieldNorm(doc=2140)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
    
    Language
    d