Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)
- Did you mean:
- authors%3a%22Wiesenm%c3%biller%2c H.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Wiesenm%c3%böhler%2c H.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Wiesenm%c3%böllers%2c H.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Wiesenm%c3%bilder%2c H.%22 2
- authors%3a%22Wiesenm%c3%beiler%2c H.%22 2
-
Tiemann, H.: ¬Die Frage der Literaturerschließung in Universitäts- und Hochschulbibliotheken (1960)
0.01
0.0122587215 = product of: 0.024517443 = sum of: 0.024517443 = product of: 0.049034886 = sum of: 0.049034886 = weight(_text_:h in 1767) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.049034886 = score(doc=1767,freq=4.0), product of: 0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.04236856 = queryNorm 0.4658342 = fieldWeight in 1767, product of: 2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of: 4.0 = termFreq=4.0 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=1767) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Footnote
- Enthält den Vorschlag einer kooperativen Sacherschließung auf Basis der SSG-Gebiete. - Vgl. auch: Tiemann, H. in ZfBB 9(1962) S.303-314 und Krieg, W.: Die Verbesserung der Literaturerschließung an den Universalbibliotheken
-
Tiemann, H.: ¬Der Stand der Frage der "Literaturerschließung" in Universitäts- und Hochschulbibliotheken (1962)
0.01
0.011557634 = product of: 0.023115268 = sum of: 0.023115268 = product of: 0.046230536 = sum of: 0.046230536 = weight(_text_:h in 1771) [ClassicSimilarity], result of: 0.046230536 = score(doc=1771,freq=2.0), product of: 0.10526253 = queryWeight, product of: 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.04236856 = queryNorm 0.4391927 = fieldWeight in 1771, product of: 1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of: 2.0 = termFreq=2.0 2.4844491 = idf(docFreq=10020, maxDocs=44218) 0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=1771) 0.5 = coord(1/2) 0.5 = coord(1/2)