Search (3 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tijssen, R.J.W."
  1. Tijssen, R.J.W.: Discarding the 'basic science/applied science' dichotomy : a knowledge utilization triangle classification system of research journals (2010) 0.01 
    0.0052265706 = product of:
  0.031359423 = sum of:
    0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 3985) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031359423 = score(doc=3985,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 3985, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3985)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    This paper introduces a comprehensive system for classifying scholarly journals according to their degree of 'application orientation.' The method extends earlier models and journal classification systems that were designed to tackle the crude duality between 'basic research' and 'applied research.' This metrics-based system rests on a 'Knowledge Utilization Triangle' typology, which distinguishes three types of coexisting knowledge application domains: 'clinical,' 'industrial,' and 'civic.' The empirical data relate to the institutional origin of authors who publish their research papers in the scientific journal literature. The case study applies indicators of 'clinical relevance' and 'industrial relevance' to 11,000 journals indexed by the Web of Science (WoS) database. The resulting multidimensional classification system of journals comprises six Journal Application Domain (JAD) categories. Macro-level trend analysis of the WoS-indexed research publication output by JAD category reveals redistributions within global science during the years 1999-2008, with a slight increase of output published in 'industrially relevant' journals.
  2. Winnink, J.J.; Tijssen, R.J.W.; Raan, F.J. van: Theory-changing breakthroughs in science : the impact of research teamwork on scientific discoveries (2016) 0.01 
    0.0052265706 = product of:
  0.031359423 = sum of:
    0.031359423 = weight(_text_:web in 2898) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.031359423 = score(doc=2898,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.14495286 = queryWeight, product of:
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.044416238 = queryNorm
        0.21634221 = fieldWeight in 2898, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          3.2635105 = idf(docFreq=4597, maxDocs=44218)
          0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2898)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Abstract
    We have developed and tested an evidence-based method for early-stage identification of scientific discoveries. Scholarly publications are analyzed to track and trace breakthrough processes as well as their impact on world science. The focus in this study is on the incremental discovery of the ubiquitin-mediated proteolytic system in the late 1970s by a small international team of collaborating researchers. Analysis of their groundbreaking research articles, all produced within a relatively short period of time, and the network of citing articles shows the cumulative effects of the intense collaboration within a small group of researchers working on the same subject. Using bibliographic data from the Web of Science database and the PATSTAT patents database in combination with expert opinions shows that these discoveries accumulated into a new technology. These first findings suggest that potential breakthrough discoveries can be identified at a relatively early stage by careful analysis of publication and citation patterns.
  3. Tijssen, R.J.W.; Wijk, E. van: ¬The global science base of information and communication technologies : bibliometric analysis of ICT research papers (1998) 0.00 
    0.0040118583 = product of:
  0.024071148 = sum of:
    0.024071148 = product of:
      0.048142295 = sum of:
        0.048142295 = weight(_text_:22 in 3691) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.048142295 = score(doc=3691,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.1555381 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.044416238 = queryNorm
            0.30952093 = fieldWeight in 3691, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3691)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.16666667 = coord(1/6)
    Date
    22. 5.1999 19:26:54

Authors

Years