Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Tosaka, Y."
  • × theme_ss:"Metadaten"
  • × type_ss:"a"
  1. Park, J.-R.; Tosaka, Y.: Metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections : criteria, semantics, and mechanisms (2010) 0.00
    0.0012504549 = product of:
      0.028760463 = sum of:
        0.028760463 = sum of:
          0.0094278185 = weight(_text_:1 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.0094278185 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.057894554 = queryWeight, product of:
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.16284466 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                2.4565027 = idf(docFreq=10304, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
          0.019332644 = weight(_text_:29 in 4163) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
            0.019332644 = score(doc=4163,freq=2.0), product of:
              0.08290443 = queryWeight, product of:
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.023567878 = queryNorm
              0.23319192 = fieldWeight in 4163, product of:
                1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                  2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                3.5176873 = idf(docFreq=3565, maxDocs=44218)
                0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=4163)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Abstract
    This article evaluates practices on metadata quality control in digital repositories and collections using an online survey of cataloging and metadata professionals in the United States. The study examines (1) the perceived importance of metadata quality, (2) metadata quality evaluation criteria and issues, and (3) mechanisms for building quality assurance into the metadata creation process. The survey finds wide recognition of the essential role of metadata quality assurance. Accuracy and consistency are prioritized as the main criteria for metadata quality evaluation. Metadata semantics greatly affects consistent and accurate metadata application. Strong awareness of metadata quality correlates with the widespread adoption of various quality control mechanisms, such as staff training, manual review, metadata guidelines, and metadata generation tools. And yet, metadata guidelines are used less frequently as a quality assurance mechanism in digital collections involving multiple institutions.
    Date
    9. 1.2011 17:11:29
  2. Park, J.-r.; Tosaka, Y.; Lu, C.: Locally added homegrown metadata semantics : issues and implications 0.00
    3.779547E-4 = product of:
      0.008692958 = sum of:
        0.008692958 = product of:
          0.017385917 = sum of:
            0.017385917 = weight(_text_:international in 3543) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.017385917 = score(doc=3543,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.078619614 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.023567878 = queryNorm
                0.22113968 = fieldWeight in 3543, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.33588 = idf(docFreq=4276, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=3543)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.04347826 = coord(1/23)
    
    Source
    Paradigms and conceptual systems in knowledge organization: Proceedings of the Eleventh International ISKO conference, Rome, 23-26 February 2010, ed. Claudio Gnoli, Indeks, Frankfurt M