Search (4 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Trant, J."
  1. Trant, J.: 'On speaking terms' : towards virtual integration of art information (1993) 0.11
    0.11285969 = product of:
      0.15047958 = sum of:
        0.033637732 = weight(_text_:information in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.033637732 = score(doc=3942,freq=12.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.38007212 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
                12.0 = termFreq=12.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.088519044 = weight(_text_:standards in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.088519044 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.22470023 = queryWeight, product of:
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.39394283 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              4.4569545 = idf(docFreq=1393, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
        0.028322803 = product of:
          0.056645606 = sum of:
            0.056645606 = weight(_text_:organization in 3942) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.056645606 = score(doc=3942,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.31513596 = fieldWeight in 3942, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=3942)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.75 = coord(3/4)
    
    Abstract
    Changing technological paradigms require new approaches to the definition of standards in the area of art information. Previously separate databases, image bases, computer aided design systems and geographical information systems are now being linked into multimedia, interdisciplinary information systems. Such integration is possible if all systems are built on a shared intellectual framework. The importance of contextual and descriptive information must be recognised when applied to museum objects. Examines how the information itself should be considered rather than delivery systems and technology if such systems are to progress
    Source
    Knowledge organization. 20(1993) no.1, S.8-11
  2. Bearman, D.; Trant, J.: When museum informatics meets the World Wide Web, it generates energy : Introduction (2000) 0.00
    0.0042914203 = product of:
      0.017165681 = sum of:
        0.017165681 = weight(_text_:information in 4287) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.017165681 = score(doc=4287,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.19395474 = fieldWeight in 4287, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=4287)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Source
    Journal of the American Society for Information Science. 51(2000) no.1, S.3-4
  3. Trant, J.: Exploring the potential for social tagging and folksonomy in art museums : proof of concept (2006) 0.00
    0.0035403504 = product of:
      0.014161401 = sum of:
        0.014161401 = product of:
          0.028322803 = sum of:
            0.028322803 = weight(_text_:organization in 5900) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
              0.028322803 = score(doc=5900,freq=2.0), product of:
                0.17974974 = queryWeight, product of:
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.050415643 = queryNorm
                0.15756798 = fieldWeight in 5900, product of:
                  1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                    2.0 = termFreq=2.0
                  3.5653565 = idf(docFreq=3399, maxDocs=44218)
                  0.03125 = fieldNorm(doc=5900)
          0.5 = coord(1/2)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Content
    Beitrag eines Themenheftes "Knowledge organization systems and services"
  4. Bearman, D.; Miller, E.; Rust, G.; Trant, J.; Weibel, S.: ¬A common model to support interoperable metadata : progress report on reconciling metadata requirements from the Dublin Core and INDECS/DOI communities (1999) 0.00
    0.0021457102 = product of:
      0.008582841 = sum of:
        0.008582841 = weight(_text_:information in 1249) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.008582841 = score(doc=1249,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.08850355 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.050415643 = queryNorm
            0.09697737 = fieldWeight in 1249, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0390625 = fieldNorm(doc=1249)
      0.25 = coord(1/4)
    
    Abstract
    The Dublin Core metadata community and the INDECS/DOI community of authors, rights holders, and publishers are seeking common ground in the expression of metadata for information resources. Recent meetings at the 6th Dublin Core Workshop in Washington DC sketched out common models for semantics (informed by the requirements articulated in the IFLA Functional Requirements for the Bibliographic Record) and conventions for knowledge representation (based on the Resource Description Framework under development by the W3C). Further development of detailed requirements is planned by both communities in the coming months with the aim of fully representing the metadata needs of each. An open "Schema Harmonization" working group has been established to identify a common framework to support interoperability among these communities. The present document represents a starting point identifying historical developments and common requirements of these perspectives on metadata and charts a path for harmonizing their respective conceptual models. It is hoped that collaboration over the coming year will result in agreed semantic and syntactic conventions that will support a high degree of interoperability among these communities, ideally expressed in a single data model and using common, standard tools.

Types

Themes