Tudhope, D.; Binding, C.: Still quite popular after all those years : the continued relevance of the information retrieval thesaurus (2016)
0.00
0.0029625234 = product of:
0.022218924 = sum of:
0.0070240153 = weight(_text_:und in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070240153 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.0064806426 = weight(_text_:in in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0064806426 = score(doc=2908,freq=12.0), product of:
0.029340398 = queryWeight, product of:
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.22087781 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
12.0 = termFreq=12.0
1.3602545 = idf(docFreq=30841, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.0070240153 = weight(_text_:und in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0070240153 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.04780656 = queryWeight, product of:
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.14692576 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
2.216367 = idf(docFreq=13101, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.0016902501 = weight(_text_:s in 2908) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.0016902501 = score(doc=2908,freq=2.0), product of:
0.023451481 = queryWeight, product of:
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.021569785 = queryNorm
0.072074346 = fieldWeight in 2908, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
1.0872376 = idf(docFreq=40523, maxDocs=44218)
0.046875 = fieldNorm(doc=2908)
0.13333334 = coord(4/30)
- Abstract
- The recent ISKO-UK conference considered the question of whether the traditional thesaurus has any place in modern information retrieval. This note is intended to continue in the spirit of that good-natured debate, arguing that there is indeed a role today and highlighting some recent work showing the continued relevance of the thesaurus, particularly in the linked data area. Key functionality that a thesaurus makes possible is discussed. A brief outline is provided of prominent work hat employs thesauri in three key areas of infrastructure underpinning advanced retrieval functionality today: metadata enrichment,vocabulary mapping and web services.
- Content
- Beitrag in einem Special issue: The Great Debate: "This House Believes that the Traditional Thesaurus has no Place in Modern Information Retrieval." [19 February 2015, 14:00-17:30 preceded by ISKO UK AGM and followed by networking, wine and nibbles; vgl.: http://www.iskouk.org/content/great-debate].
- Source
- Knowledge organization. 43(2016) no.3, S.174-179
- Theme
- Konzeption und Anwendung des Prinzips Thesaurus
