-
Tudhope, D.: Knowledge Organization System Services : brief review of NKOS activities and possibility of KOS registries (2007)
0.02
0.021171294 = product of:
0.04234259 = sum of:
0.04234259 = product of:
0.08468518 = sum of:
0.08468518 = weight(_text_:22 in 100) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.08468518 = score(doc=100,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05208721 = queryNorm
0.46428138 = fieldWeight in 100, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.09375 = fieldNorm(doc=100)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 22. 9.2007 15:41:14
-
Tudhope, D.; Hodge, G.: Terminology registries (2007)
0.02
0.017642746 = product of:
0.03528549 = sum of:
0.03528549 = product of:
0.07057098 = sum of:
0.07057098 = weight(_text_:22 in 539) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.07057098 = score(doc=539,freq=2.0), product of:
0.18240054 = queryWeight, product of:
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.05208721 = queryNorm
0.38690117 = fieldWeight in 539, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
3.5018296 = idf(docFreq=3622, maxDocs=44218)
0.078125 = fieldNorm(doc=539)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Date
- 26.12.2011 13:22:07
-
Golub, K.; Moon, J.; Nielsen, M.L.; Tudhope, D.: EnTag: Enhanced Tagging for Discovery (2008)
0.01
0.010465209 = product of:
0.020930419 = sum of:
0.020930419 = product of:
0.083721675 = sum of:
0.083721675 = weight(_text_:authors in 2294) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
0.083721675 = score(doc=2294,freq=2.0), product of:
0.2374559 = queryWeight, product of:
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.05208721 = queryNorm
0.35257778 = fieldWeight in 2294, product of:
1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
2.0 = termFreq=2.0
4.558814 = idf(docFreq=1258, maxDocs=44218)
0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2294)
0.25 = coord(1/4)
0.5 = coord(1/2)
- Abstract
- Purpose: Investigate the combination of controlled and folksonomy approaches to support resource discovery in repositories and digital collections. Aim: Investigate whether use of an established controlled vocabulary can help improve social tagging for better resource discovery. Objectives: (1) Investigate indexing aspects when using only social tagging versus when using social tagging with suggestions from a controlled vocabulary; (2) Investigate above in two different contexts: tagging by readers and tagging by authors; (3) Investigate influence of only social tagging versus social tagging with a controlled vocabulary on retrieval. - Vgl.: http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/projects/enhanced-tagging/.