Search (2 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ungvary, R."
  • × language_ss:"e"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Ungvary, R.: Application of the thesaurus method to the communication of knowledge (1983) 0.00 
    0.00270615 = product of:
  0.0054123 = sum of:
    0.0054123 = product of:
      0.0108246 = sum of:
        0.0108246 = weight(_text_:a in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0108246 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Type
    a
  2. Ungvary, R.: Intensional splitting : an empirical examination of conceptual duality (1986) 0.00 
    0.001674345 = product of:
  0.00334869 = sum of:
    0.00334869 = product of:
      0.00669738 = sum of:
        0.00669738 = weight(_text_:a in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.00669738 = score(doc=5219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.053105544 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.046056706 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
      0.5 = coord(1/2)
  0.5 = coord(1/2)
    Abstract
    Certain words are extremely closely connected, regarding their meanings; such word pairs can be formed, however, not only with the well-known synonyms and antonyms, but also with words of clearly different meaning (e.g. light-photon). Our studies show that, even in the case of real synonyms, there is a purely semantical - and consequently conceptual - difference between the parts/elements of the word pairs. Within the pairs there is an elementary conceptual accessibility between the parts; according to all indications this is the basis for the remarkable semantical connection. This close connection is the intensional splitting, the quantum of relation. It is assumed that is plays an important role in the semantical deep structure. Synonyms and antonyms are mere random marks of the existence of this relation on the level of the natural language
    Type
    a