Search (5 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Ungvary, R."
  • × type_ss:"a"
  • × year_i:[1980 TO 1990}
  1. Ungvary, R.: ¬Die Anwendung der Thesaurusmethode bei der Vermittlung von Wissen (1986) 0.03 
    0.03318674 = product of:
  0.06637348 = sum of:
    0.064728215 = weight(_text_:von in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.064728215 = score(doc=125,freq=12.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.5054244 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
          3.4641016 = tf(freq=12.0), with freq of:
            12.0 = termFreq=12.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
    0.0016452647 = product of:
      0.004935794 = sum of:
        0.004935794 = weight(_text_:a in 125) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.004935794 = score(doc=125,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.089176424 = fieldWeight in 125, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=125)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Mit Hilfe von beschrifteten, gerichteten Graphen können in vereinfachter Form die Zusammenhänge der Fachbegriffe einer Äußerung, eines Themas, eines Gegenstandsbereiches dargestellt werden. Solche semantischen Graphen können auch als Modelle des Wissens verstanden und bei der Vermittlung von Wissen - im Unterricht, im Text - als Skizze der Gedanken und Gedankengänge verwendet werden. Ihre Rolle ist mit der eines Inhaltsverzeichnisses zu vergleichen. Das semantische Modell repräsentiert die Skizze der Bedeutung von Inhalten, das Inhaltsverzeichnis hingegen die Skizze des Gegenstandes von Inhalten. Mit Hilfe der Thesaurusmethode erfolgt die Vermittlung von Wissen über Klassifikation durch die 'Klassifikation' selbst
    Type
    a
  2. Ungvary, R.: ¬Die Qualität des Begrifflichen : eine Untersuchung der Symmetrieverhältnisse von Begriffsgefügen (1985) 0.03 
    0.03208051 = product of:
  0.06416102 = sum of:
    0.060400415 = weight(_text_:von in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.060400415 = score(doc=5577,freq=2.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.47163114 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
          1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
            2.0 = termFreq=2.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
    0.003760605 = product of:
      0.011281814 = sum of:
        0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 5577) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011281814 = score(doc=5577,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5577, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5577)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Type
    a
  3. Ungvary, R.: ¬Ein natürliches System der Gegenstände (1985) 0.02 
    0.022294924 = product of:
  0.044589847 = sum of:
    0.042709544 = weight(_text_:von in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
      0.042709544 = score(doc=113,freq=4.0), product of:
        0.12806706 = queryWeight, product of:
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.04800207 = queryNorm
        0.3334936 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
          2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
            4.0 = termFreq=4.0
          2.6679487 = idf(docFreq=8340, maxDocs=44218)
          0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
    0.0018803024 = product of:
      0.005640907 = sum of:
        0.005640907 = weight(_text_:a in 113) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.005640907 = score(doc=113,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.10191591 = fieldWeight in 113, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0625 = fieldNorm(doc=113)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.5 = coord(2/4)
    Abstract
    Mit Hilfe eines generativen Modells der Begriffe der Gegenstände sollten alle wahrscheinlichen und 'unwahrscheinlichen' atomaren Gegnstände der Natur und Gesellschaft bzw. der praktischen Handlung und der theoretischen Überlegung feststellbar und die molekularen Gegenstände ableitbar sein. Das Modell wurde ursprünglich zur Klassifikation von Periodika einer Zeitschriftendatenbank erstellt und durch KLassieren von ca. 17.000 Periodika überprüft
    Type
    a
  4. Ungvary, R.: Application of the thesaurus method to the communication of knowledge (1983) 0.00 
    9.401512E-4 = product of:
  0.003760605 = sum of:
    0.003760605 = product of:
      0.011281814 = sum of:
        0.011281814 = weight(_text_:a in 5578) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.011281814 = score(doc=5578,freq=2.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.20383182 = fieldWeight in 5578, product of:
              1.4142135 = tf(freq=2.0), with freq of:
                2.0 = termFreq=2.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.125 = fieldNorm(doc=5578)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Type
    a
  5. Ungvary, R.: Intensional splitting : an empirical examination of conceptual duality (1986) 0.00 
    5.8168895E-4 = product of:
  0.0023267558 = sum of:
    0.0023267558 = product of:
      0.0069802674 = sum of:
        0.0069802674 = weight(_text_:a in 5219) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.0069802674 = score(doc=5219,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.055348642 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.04800207 = queryNorm
            0.12611452 = fieldWeight in 5219, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.153047 = idf(docFreq=37942, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=5219)
      0.33333334 = coord(1/3)
  0.25 = coord(1/4)
    Abstract
    Certain words are extremely closely connected, regarding their meanings; such word pairs can be formed, however, not only with the well-known synonyms and antonyms, but also with words of clearly different meaning (e.g. light-photon). Our studies show that, even in the case of real synonyms, there is a purely semantical - and consequently conceptual - difference between the parts/elements of the word pairs. Within the pairs there is an elementary conceptual accessibility between the parts; according to all indications this is the basis for the remarkable semantical connection. This close connection is the intensional splitting, the quantum of relation. It is assumed that is plays an important role in the semantical deep structure. Synonyms and antonyms are mere random marks of the existence of this relation on the level of the natural language
    Type
    a

Languages