Search (1 results, page 1 of 1)

  • × author_ss:"Valas, G."
  • × theme_ss:"Bibliographische Software"
  • × year_i:[1990 TO 2000}
  1. Valas, G.: Comparison of some widespread CD-ROM information retrieval software packages (1994) 0.01
    0.0068969904 = product of:
      0.04138194 = sum of:
        0.010425833 = weight(_text_:information in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.010425833 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.054299686 = queryWeight, product of:
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.1920054 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              1.7554779 = idf(docFreq=20772, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
        0.030956108 = weight(_text_:retrieval in 2419) [ClassicSimilarity], result of:
          0.030956108 = score(doc=2419,freq=4.0), product of:
            0.09356537 = queryWeight, product of:
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.03093157 = queryNorm
            0.33085006 = fieldWeight in 2419, product of:
              2.0 = tf(freq=4.0), with freq of:
                4.0 = termFreq=4.0
              3.024915 = idf(docFreq=5836, maxDocs=44218)
              0.0546875 = fieldNorm(doc=2419)
      0.16666667 = coord(2/12)
    
    Abstract
    Reports the results of a study, conducted at the National Technical Information Centre and Library (OMIKK), Hungary, to compare 5 popular proprietary CD-ROM searching software packages: OPTIWARE; BRS/Search; ProQuest; SPIRS; and Dialog OnDisc Manager. Software evaluation was based on analysis of a range of CD-ROM bibliographic databases (with the exception of BRS/Search for which the library held no bibliographic databases) and focused on: response times for various activities (logging on, searching, retrieval, display); other performance factors; direct searching features (Boolean operators, proximity operators, arithmetic relations, truncation); index browsing; search strategy handling; display possibilities; output possibilities; and ergonomic and user friendliness factors. No general conclusions are drawn and users are left to draw their own conclusions